Warden Stuart J, Dick Andrew, Simon Janet E, Manini Todd M, Russ David W, Lyssikatos Charalampos, Clark Leatha A, Clark Brian C
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States.
Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States.
JBMR Plus. 2024 Jan 4;8(1):ziad002. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziad002. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass and structural deterioration of bone tissue, which leads to bone fragility (ie, weakness) and an increased risk for fracture. The current standard for assessing bone health and diagnosing osteoporosis is DXA, which quantifies areal BMD, typically at the hip and spine. However, DXA-derived BMD assesses only one component of bone health and is notably limited in evaluating the bone strength, a critical factor in fracture resistance. Although multifrequency vibration analysis can quickly and painlessly assay bone strength, there has been limited success in advancing a device of this nature. Recent progress has resulted in the development of Cortical Bone Mechanics Technology (CBMT), which conducts a dynamic 3-point bending test to assess the flexural rigidity () of ulnar cortical bone. Data indicate that ulnar accurately estimates ulnar whole bone strength and provides unique and independent information about cortical bone compared to DXA-derived BMD. Consequently, CBMT has the potential to address a critical unmet need: Better identification of patients with diminished bone strength who are at high risk of experiencing a fragility fracture. However, the clinical utility of CBMT-derived has not yet been demonstrated. We have designed a clinical study to assess the accuracy of CBMT-derived ulnar in discriminating post-menopausal women who have suffered a fragility fracture from those who have not. These data will be compared to DXA-derived peripheral and central measures of BMD obtained from the same subjects. In this article, we describe the study protocol for this multi-center fracture discrimination study (The STRONGER Study).
骨质疏松症的特征是骨量低和骨组织结构恶化,这会导致骨脆性(即骨强度降低)并增加骨折风险。目前评估骨骼健康和诊断骨质疏松症的标准是双能X线吸收法(DXA),它可以量化面积骨密度,通常是在髋部和脊柱部位。然而,DXA得出的骨密度仅评估了骨骼健康的一个方面,在评估骨强度(抗骨折的关键因素)方面存在明显局限性。尽管多频振动分析可以快速且无痛地测定骨强度,但在推进此类设备方面取得的成功有限。最近的进展促成了皮质骨力学技术(CBMT)的开发,该技术通过动态三点弯曲试验来评估尺骨皮质骨的抗弯刚度( )。数据表明,与DXA得出的骨密度相比,尺骨抗弯刚度能准确估算尺骨的整体骨强度,并提供有关皮质骨的独特且独立的信息。因此,CBMT有潜力满足一项关键的未满足需求:更好地识别骨强度降低且有脆性骨折高风险的患者。然而,CBMT得出的抗弯刚度的临床效用尚未得到证实。我们设计了一项临床研究,以评估CBMT得出的尺骨抗弯刚度在区分绝经后脆性骨折女性和未发生脆性骨折女性方面的准确性。这些数据将与从同一受试者获得的DXA得出的外周和中央骨密度测量值进行比较。在本文中,我们描述了这项多中心骨折鉴别研究(STRONGER研究)的研究方案。