Suppr超能文献

一大群肥胖门诊患者静息能量消耗的预测与评估

Prediction and evaluation of resting energy expenditure in a large group of obese outpatients.

作者信息

Marra M, Cioffi I, Sammarco R, Montagnese C, Naccarato M, Amato V, Contaldo F, Pasanisi F

机构信息

Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Interuniversity Centre for Obesity and Eating Disorders (CISRODCA), Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 May;41(5):697-705. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.34. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare resting energy expenditure (REE) measured (MREE) by indirect calorimetry (IC) and REE predicted (PREE) from established predictive equations in a large sample of obese Caucasian adults.

SUBJECTS/METHODS: We evaluated 1851 obese patients (body mass index (BMI)>30 kg m) aged between 18a and 65 years. Data were obtained by comparing MREE with PREE, derived from different equations, within and between normal weight and obese groups. The mean differences between PREE and MREE as well as the accuracy prediction within ±10% level were investigated in the whole sample and in three subgroups, classified by BMI (Group 1=30-39.9 kg m; Group 2=40-49.9 kg m; Group 3>50 kg m).

RESULTS

We observed that FAO, Henry and Muller3 (body composition (BC)) equations provided good mean PREE-MREE (bias -0.7, -0.3 and 0.9%; root mean standard error (RMSE) 273, 263 and 269 kcal per day, respectively); HB and Henry equations were more accurate individually (57 and 56.9%). Only the Muller1 (BC) equation gave the lowest PREE-MREE difference (bias -1.7%; RMSE 228 kcal per day) in females, while Johnstone and De Lorenzo equations were the most accurate (55.1 and 54.8%). When the sample was split into three subgroups according to BMI, no differences were found in males; however, the majority of the equations included in this study failed to estimate REE in severely obese females (BMI>40 kg m). Overall, prediction accuracy was low (~55%) for all predictive equations, regardless of BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Different established equations can be used for estimating REE at the population level in both sexes. However, the accuracy was very low for all predictive equations used, particularly among females and when BMI was high, limiting their use in clinical practice. Our findings suggest that the validation of new predictive equations would improve the accuracy of REE prediction, especially for severely obese subjects (BMI>40 kg m).

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在比较通过间接测热法(IC)测得的静息能量消耗(REE)(MREE)与根据既定预测方程预测的肥胖白种成年人样本中的REE(PREE)。

对象/方法:我们评估了1851名年龄在18岁至65岁之间的肥胖患者(体重指数(BMI)>30 kg/m²)。通过比较正常体重组和肥胖组内及组间不同方程得出的MREE和PREE来获取数据。研究了整个样本以及按BMI分类的三个亚组(第1组=30 - 39.9 kg/m²;第2组=40 - 49.9 kg/m²;第3组>50 kg/m²)中PREE与MREE之间的平均差异以及±10%水平内的预测准确性。

结果

我们观察到,FAO、Henry和Muller3(身体成分(BC))方程提供了良好的平均PREE - MREE(偏差分别为 -0.7%、-0.3%和0.9%;均方根标准误差(RMSE)分别为每天273、263和269千卡);HB和Henry方程个体准确性更高(分别为57%和56.9%)。只有Muller1(BC)方程在女性中给出了最低的PREE - MREE差异(偏差 -1.7%;RMSE为每天228千卡),而Johnstone和De Lorenzo方程最为准确(分别为55.1%和54.8%)。当根据BMI将样本分为三个亚组时,男性中未发现差异;然而,本研究中包含的大多数方程未能准确估计重度肥胖女性(BMI>40 kg/m²)的REE。总体而言,无论BMI如何,所有预测方程的预测准确性都较低(约55%)。

结论

不同的既定方程可用于估计两性人群的REE。然而,所使用的所有预测方程的准确性都非常低,尤其是在女性中以及BMI较高时,这限制了它们在临床实践中的应用。我们的研究结果表明,新预测方程的验证将提高REE预测的准确性,特别是对于重度肥胖受试者(BMI>40 kg/m²)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/5418562/2f0742a16a1b/ijo201734f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验