Stange Eduard F, Wehkamp Jan
Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
F1000Res. 2016 Dec 21;5:2896. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9890.1. eCollection 2016.
There is consensus that inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are the result of "dysregulated" immune reactivity towards commensal microorganisms in the intestine. This gut microbiome is clearly altered in IBD, but its primary or secondary role is still debated. The focus has shifted from adaptive to innate immunity, with its multitude of receptor molecules (Toll-like and NOD receptors) and antibacterial effector molecules (defensins, cathelicidin, and others). The latter appear to be at least partly deficient at different intestinal locations. Host genetics also support the notion that microbe-host interaction at the mucosa is the prime site of pathogenesis. In contrast, even the latest therapeutic antibodies are directed against secondary targets like cytokines and integrins identified decades ago. These so-called "biologicals" have disappointing long-term results, with the majority of patients not achieving remission in the long run. A promising approach is the development of novel drugs like defensin-derived molecules that substitute for the missing endogenous antibacterials.
人们普遍认为,炎症性肠病(IBD)是肠道对共生微生物的免疫反应“失调”的结果。IBD患者的肠道微生物群明显改变,但其主要或次要作用仍存在争议。研究重点已从适应性免疫转向先天性免疫,涉及众多受体分子(Toll样受体和NOD受体)和抗菌效应分子(防御素、cathelicidin等)。后者在不同肠道部位似乎至少部分缺乏。宿主遗传学也支持这样一种观点,即黏膜处的微生物与宿主相互作用是发病机制的主要部位。相比之下,即使是最新的治疗性抗体也针对几十年前确定的细胞因子和整合素等次要靶点。这些所谓的“生物制剂”长期效果令人失望,大多数患者最终无法实现缓解。一种有前景的方法是开发新型药物,如防御素衍生分子,以替代缺失的内源性抗菌物质。
F1000Res. 2016-12-21
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015-1
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2002-9
Biochem Soc Trans. 2006-4
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015-1
Transl Res. 2007-4
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011-6
Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2014
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009-6
Adv Clin Chem. 2016-6-30
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015-11-10
Biomed Rep. 2015-1