Wehkamp Jan, Stange Eduard F
Department of Internal Medicine 1, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
F1000Res. 2018 Aug 7;7. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15159.1. eCollection 2018.
The so-called "biologicals" (monoclonal antibodies to various inflammatory targets like tumor necrosis factor or integrins) have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. In ulcerative colitis, they have an established role in inducing remission in steroid-refractory disease and, thereafter, maintaining remission with or without azathioprine. Nevertheless, their limitations are also obvious: lack of primary response or loss of response during maintenance as well as various, in part severe, side effects. The latter are less frequent in anti-integrin treatment, but efficacy, especially during induction, is delayed. New antibodies as well as small molecules have also demonstrated clinical efficacy and are soon to be licensed for ulcerative colitis. None of these novel drugs seems to be much more effective overall than the competition, but they provide new options in otherwise refractory patients. This increasing complexity requires new algorithms, but it is still premature to outline each drug's role in future treatment paradigms.
所谓的“生物制剂”(针对各种炎症靶点的单克隆抗体,如肿瘤坏死因子或整合素)彻底改变了炎症性肠病的治疗方法。在溃疡性结肠炎中,它们在诱导激素难治性疾病缓解方面具有既定作用,此后,无论是否使用硫唑嘌呤,都可维持缓解。然而,它们的局限性也很明显:缺乏初始反应或在维持治疗期间失去反应,以及各种(部分严重)副作用。后者在抗整合素治疗中不太常见,但疗效,尤其是在诱导期间,会延迟。新的抗体以及小分子也已证明具有临床疗效,很快将获得溃疡性结肠炎的许可。这些新药似乎总体上并不比竞争对手更有效,但它们为其他难治性患者提供了新的选择。这种日益增加的复杂性需要新的算法,但概述每种药物在未来治疗模式中的作用仍为时过早。