Suppr超能文献

急诊医师关于美国急诊医师学会“明智选择”建议的知识、态度及行为:一项调查研究

Emergency Physician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior Regarding ACEP's Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Survey Study.

作者信息

Lin Michelle P, Nguyen Thomas, Probst Marc A, Richardson Lynne D, Schuur Jeremiah D

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(6):668-675. doi: 10.1111/acem.13167. Epub 2017 May 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2013, the American College of Emergency Physicians joined the Choosing Wisely campaign; however, its impact on emergency physician behavior is unknown. We assessed knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported behaviors regarding the Choosing Wisely recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey of emergency physicians at a national meeting. We approached 819 physicians; 765 (93.4%) completed the survey.

RESULTS

As a result of the Choosing Wisely campaign, most respondents (64.5%) felt more comfortable discussing low-value services with patients, 54.5% reported reducing utilization, and 52.5% were aware of local efforts to promote the campaign. A majority (62.97%) of respondents were able to identify at least four of five recommendations. The most prevalent low-value practices were computed tomography (CT) brain for minor head injury (29.9%) and antibiotics for acute sinusitis (26.9%). Few respondents reported performing lumbar radiograph for nontraumatic low back pain (7.8%) and Foley catheter for patients who can void (5.6%). Respondents reported patient/family expectations as the most important reason for ordering antibiotics for sinusitis (68%) and imaging for low back pain (56.8%). However, concern for serious diagnosis was the most important reason for performing CT chest for patients with normal D-dimer (49.7%) and CT abdomen for recurrent uncomplicated renal colic (42.5%). A minority (3.8% to 26.7%) of respondents identified malpractice risk as the primary reason for performing low-value services.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite familiarity with Choosing Wisely, many emergency physicians report performing low-value services. Primary reasons for low-value services differ: antibiotic prescribing was driven by patient/family expectations, while concern for serious diagnosis influenced advanced diagnostic imaging. Greater efforts are needed to promote effective dissemination and implementation; such efforts may be targeted based on differing reasons for low-value services.

摘要

目的

2013年,美国急诊医师学会加入了“明智选择”运动;然而,其对急诊医师行为的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了关于“明智选择”推荐的知识、态度和自我报告行为。

方法

我们在一次全国性会议上对急诊医师进行了横断面调查。我们接触了819名医师;765名(93.4%)完成了调查。

结果

由于“明智选择”运动,大多数受访者(64.5%)在与患者讨论低价值服务时感觉更自在,54.5%报告减少了医疗服务的使用,52.5%知晓当地推广该运动的努力。大多数(62.97%)受访者能够识别五项推荐中的至少四项。最常见的低价值医疗行为是对轻度头部损伤进行头颅计算机断层扫描(CT)(29.9%)以及对急性鼻窦炎使用抗生素(26.9%)。很少有受访者报告对非创伤性下腰痛进行腰椎X线摄影(7.8%)以及对能够自主排尿的患者留置导尿管(5.6%)。受访者报告患者/家属期望是为鼻窦炎开具抗生素(68%)和为下腰痛进行影像学检查(56.8%)的最重要原因。然而,对于D-二聚体正常的患者进行胸部CT(49.7%)以及对复发性单纯性肾绞痛进行腹部CT(42.5%),担心漏诊严重疾病是最重要的原因。少数受访者(3.8%至26.7%)认为医疗过失风险是进行低价值医疗服务的主要原因。

结论

尽管熟悉“明智选择”运动,但许多急诊医师报告仍在进行低价值医疗服务。低价值医疗服务的主要原因各不相同:抗生素处方是由患者/家属期望驱动的,而对严重诊断的担忧影响了高级诊断性影像学检查。需要做出更大努力来促进有效传播和实施;此类努力可根据低价值医疗服务的不同原因进行针对性开展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验