• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

万古霉素与甲硝唑预防艰难梭菌感染患者复发和死亡的疗效比较。

Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Prevention of Recurrence and Death in Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection.

机构信息

IDEAS 2.0 Center, Veterans Affairs (VA) Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah2Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.

Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):546-553. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9045.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9045
PMID:28166328
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Metronidazole hydrochloride has historically been considered first-line therapy for patients with mild to moderate Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) but is inferior to vancomycin hydrochloride for clinical cure. The choice of therapy may likewise have substantial consequences on other downstream outcomes, such as recurrence and mortality, although these secondary outcomes have been less studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of recurrence and all-cause 30-day mortality among patients receiving metronidazole or vancomycin for the treatment of mild to moderate and severe CDI.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study evaluated patients treated for CDI, defined as a positive laboratory test result for the presence of C difficile toxins or toxin genes in a stool sample, in the US Department of Veterans Affairs health care system from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2012. Data analysis was performed from February 7, 2015, through November 22, 2016.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcomes of interest in this study were CDI recurrence and all-cause 30-day mortality. Recurrence was defined as a second positive laboratory test result within 8 weeks of the initial CDI diagnosis. All-cause 30-day mortality was defined as death from any cause within 30 days of the initial CDI diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 47 471 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.8 [13.3] years; 1947 women [4.1%] and 45 524 men [95.9%]) developed CDI, were treated with vancomycin or metronidazole, and met criteria for entry into the study. Of 47 147 eligible first treatment episodes, 2068 (4.4%) were with vancomycin. Those 2068 patients were matched to 8069 patients in the metronidazole group for a total of 10 137 included patients. Subcohorts were constructed that comprised 5452 patients with mild to moderate disease and 3130 patients with severe disease. There were no differences in the risk of recurrence between patients treated with vancomycin vs those treated with metronidazole in any of the disease severity cohorts. Among patients in the any severity cohort, those who were treated with vancomycin were less likely to die (adjusted relative risk, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.98; adjusted risk difference, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.03 to -0.01). No significant difference was found in the risk of mortality between treatment groups among patients with mild to moderate CDI, but vancomycin significantly reduced the risk of all-cause 30-day mortality among patients with severe CDI (adjusted relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97; adjusted risk difference, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Recurrence rates were similar among patients treated with vancomycin and metronidazole. However, the risk of 30-day mortality was significantly reduced among patients who received vancomycin. Our findings may further justify the use of vancomycin as initial therapy for severe CDI.

摘要

重要性

盐酸甲硝锉一直被认为是轻度至中度艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者的一线治疗药物,但在临床治愈率方面不如盐酸万古霉素。治疗选择可能同样对其他下游结果产生重大影响,例如复发和死亡率,尽管这些次要结果的研究较少。

目的

评估接受甲硝锉或万古霉素治疗轻度至中度和重度 CDI 的患者的复发风险和全因 30 天死亡率。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性、倾向匹配队列研究评估了在美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中接受 CDI 治疗的患者,定义为粪便样本中存在艰难梭菌毒素或毒素基因的实验室检测结果阳性。数据分析于 2015 年 2 月 7 日至 2016 年 11 月 22 日进行。

暴露

接受万古霉素或甲硝锉治疗。

主要结果和测量

本研究的主要结果是 CDI 复发和全因 30 天死亡率。复发定义为初次 CDI 诊断后 8 周内第二次阳性实验室检测结果。全因 30 天死亡率定义为初次 CDI 诊断后 30 天内任何原因导致的死亡。

结果

共有 47471 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄 68.8[13.3]岁;1947 名女性[4.1%]和 45524 名男性[95.9%])患有 CDI,接受了万古霉素或甲硝锉治疗,并符合进入研究的标准。在 47147 例合格的初次治疗发作中,2068 例(4.4%)使用万古霉素。这 2068 名患者与甲硝锉组的 8069 名患者相匹配,共有 10137 名患者纳入研究。构建了亚组,包括 5452 例轻度至中度疾病患者和 3130 例重度疾病患者。在任何严重程度的队列中,接受万古霉素治疗的患者与接受甲硝锉治疗的患者相比,复发风险没有差异。在任何严重程度的队列中,接受万古霉素治疗的患者死亡风险较低(校正相对风险 0.86;95%CI,0.74 至 0.98;校正风险差异-0.02;95%CI,-0.03 至-0.01)。在轻度至中度 CDI 患者中,治疗组之间的死亡率风险无显著差异,但万古霉素显著降低了重度 CDI 患者的全因 30 天死亡率风险(校正相对风险 0.79;95%CI,0.65 至 0.97;校正风险差异-0.04;95%CI,-0.07 至-0.01)。

结论和相关性

接受万古霉素和甲硝锉治疗的患者复发率相似。然而,接受万古霉素治疗的患者 30 天死亡率显著降低。我们的发现可能进一步证明万古霉素作为重度 CDI 的初始治疗是合理的。

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Vancomycin and Metronidazole for the Prevention of Recurrence and Death in Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection.万古霉素与甲硝唑预防艰难梭菌感染患者复发和死亡的疗效比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):546-553. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9045.
2
Vancomycin vs Metronidazole for Clostridium difficile infection: focus on recurrence and mortality.万古霉素与甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌感染的比较:关注复发率和死亡率
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;12(6):871-872. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1710-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Clinical Significance of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile Growth in Stool Cultures during the Era of Nonculture Methods for the Diagnosis of C. difficile Infection.非培养方法诊断艰难梭菌感染时代粪便培养中产毒艰难梭菌生长的临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0079921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00799-21. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
4
Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin.艰难梭菌感染首次复发的治疗:非达霉素与万古霉素比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Aug;55 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S154-61. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis462.
5
Outcomes associated with recent guideline recommendations removing metronidazole for treatment of non-severe Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective, observational, nationwide cohort study.与最近的指南建议去除甲硝唑治疗非严重艰难梭菌感染相关的结果:一项回顾性、观察性、全国性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Mar;57(3):106282. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106282. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
6
Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study. fidaxomicin 与甲硝唑、万古霉素及其联合治疗首发、首次复发和严重艰难梭菌感染的疗效比较:一项观察性队列研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
What Is the Role for Metronidazole in the Treatment of Clostridium difficile Infection? Results From a National Cohort Study of Veterans With Initial Mild Disease.甲硝唑在艰难梭菌感染治疗中的作用是什么?一项针对初发轻症退伍军人的全国队列研究结果
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 27;69(8):1288-1295. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1077.
8
Does Addition of Intravenous Metronidazole to Oral Vancomycin Improve Outcomes in Clostridioides difficile Infection?静脉注射甲硝唑是否能改善艰难梭菌感染的疗效?
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 3;71(9):2414-2420. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1115.
9
A meta-analysis of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, stratified by disease severity.一项针对甲硝唑和万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的荟萃分析,按疾病严重程度分层。
Braz J Infect Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;19(4):339-49. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 May 19.
10
Outcome of Clostridioides difficile infections treated in a Swiss tertiary care hospital: an observational study.瑞士一家三级保健医院治疗艰难梭菌感染的结果:一项观察性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Jan 15;150:w20173. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20173.

引用本文的文献

1
Preclinical evaluation of 6-Gingerol in modulating gut microbiota and SCFAs to mitigate -associated diarrhea in mice.6-姜酚调节肠道微生物群和短链脂肪酸以减轻小鼠相关腹泻的临床前评估。
Front Chem. 2025 Aug 28;13:1635781. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2025.1635781. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of chemical methods in the extraction of spore surface layers in spores.评估用于提取孢子中孢子表面层的化学方法。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 19:2025.08.19.671018. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.19.671018.
3
Trends and Efficacy in Clostridioides difficile Infection Management at a Polish Clinical Hospital.
波兰一家临床医院艰难梭菌感染管理的趋势与疗效
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Aug 7;31:e948254. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948254.
4
Healthcare-Associated Infection: A Hospital-Based Retrospective Study in North Eastern Romania.医疗保健相关感染:罗马尼亚东北部一项基于医院的回顾性研究
Microorganisms. 2025 Jun 13;13(6):1377. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061377.
5
Pterostilbene attenuates intestinal barrier damage and secondary liver oxidative stress in a murine model of infection by regulating the gut microbiota.紫檀芪通过调节肠道微生物群减轻小鼠感染模型中的肠道屏障损伤和继发性肝脏氧化应激。
Food Funct. 2025 May 6;16(9):3325-3343. doi: 10.1039/d4fo06413e.
6
A Review of Therapies for Infection.感染治疗综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;14(1):17. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010017.
7
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Recurrent Infection Among Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients: A Single-center, Retrospective 10-year Study.造血细胞移植受者复发性感染的流行病学及转归:一项单中心、回顾性10年研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 1;11(10):ofae570. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae570. eCollection 2024 Oct.
8
Management of Severe Colitis and Toxic Megacolon.重症结肠炎和中毒性巨结肠的管理
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Dec 29;37(6):404-410. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777665. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Current and Ongoing Developments in Targeting Infection and Recurrence.针对感染和复发的当前及正在进行的进展。
Microorganisms. 2024 Jun 15;12(6):1206. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12061206.
10
Reviewing the Mouse Model: Insights into Infection Mechanisms.回顾小鼠模型:对感染机制的见解。
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 27;12(2):273. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020273.