Hurd Thelma C, Kaplan Charles D, Cook Elise D, Chilton Janice A, Lytton Jay S, Hawk Ernest T, Jones Lovell A
1 Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
2 Haimovitch Center for Science in the Human Services, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):170-179. doi: 10.1177/1740774516688860. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Trust is the cornerstone of clinical trial recruitment and retention. Efforts to decrease barriers and increase clinical trial participation among diverse populations have yielded modest results. There is an urgent need to better understand the complex interactions between trust and clinical trial participation. The process of trust-building has been a focus of intense research in the business community. Yet, little has been published about trust in oncology clinical trials or the process of building trust in clinical trials. Both clinical trials and business share common dimensions. Business strategies for building trust may be transferable to the clinical trial setting. This study was conducted to understand and utilize contemporary thinking about building trust to develop an Integrated Model of Trust that incorporates both clinical and business perspectives.
A key word-directed literature search of the PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Google Search databases for entries dated between 1 January 1985 and 1 September 2015 was conducted to obtain information from which to develop an Integrated Model of Trust.
Successful trial participation requires both participants and clinical trial team members to build distinctly different types of interpersonal trust to effect recruitment and retention. They are built under conditions of significant emotional stress and time constraints among people who do not know each other and have never worked together before. Swift Trust and Traditional Trust are sequentially built during the clinical trial process. Swift trust operates during the recruitment and very early active treatment phases of the clinical trial process. Traditional trust is built over time and operates during the active treatment and surveillance stages of clinical trials. The Psychological Contract frames the participants' and clinical trial team members' interpersonal trust relationship. The "terms" of interpersonal trust are negotiated through the psychological contract. Contract renegotiation occurs in response to cyclical changes within the trust relationship throughout trial participation.
The Integrated Model of Trust offers a novel framework to interrogate the process by which diverse populations and clinical trial teams build trust. To our knowledge, this is the first model of trust-building in clinical trials that frames trust development through integrated clinical and business perspectives. By focusing on the process, rather than outcomes of trust-building diverse trial participants, clinical trials teams, participants, and cancer centers may be able to better understand, measure, and manage their trust relationships in real time. Ultimately, this may foster increased recruitment and retention of diverse populations to clinical trials.
背景/目的:信任是临床试验招募和受试者留存的基石。为减少障碍并提高不同人群参与临床试验的比例所做的努力成果有限。迫切需要更好地理解信任与临床试验参与之间复杂的相互作用。信任建立过程一直是商业领域深入研究的重点。然而,关于肿瘤学临床试验中的信任或临床试验中信任建立过程的研究报道较少。临床试验和商业有一些共同的维度。建立信任的商业策略可能适用于临床试验环境。本研究旨在理解并运用关于建立信任的当代思维,以开发一个整合临床和商业视角的信任综合模型。
对PubMed、Medline、Cochrane和谷歌搜索数据库进行关键词定向文献检索,获取1985年1月1日至2015年9月1日期间的条目信息,以便开发信任综合模型。
成功参与试验要求参与者和临床试验团队成员建立截然不同类型的人际信任,以实现招募和受试者留存。这些信任是在彼此不认识且从未共事过的人之间,在巨大的情感压力和时间限制条件下建立的。快速信任和传统信任在临床试验过程中依次建立。快速信任在临床试验过程的招募阶段和非常早期的积极治疗阶段发挥作用。传统信任是随着时间建立的,在临床试验的积极治疗和监测阶段发挥作用。心理契约构建了参与者与临床试验团队成员之间的人际信任关系。人际信任的“条款”通过心理契约进行协商。在整个试验参与过程中,随着信任关系的周期性变化会进行契约重新谈判。
信任综合模型提供了一个新颖的框架,用于审视不同人群与临床试验团队建立信任的过程。据我们所知,这是首个通过整合临床和商业视角来构建信任发展框架的临床试验信任建立模型。通过关注信任建立的过程而非结果,不同的试验参与者、临床试验团队、受试者和癌症中心或许能够更好地实时理解、衡量和管理他们的信任关系。最终,这可能会促进不同人群更多地参与并留存于临床试验。