Grine Frederick E, Wurz Sarah, Marean Curtis W
Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA; Department Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA.
School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
J Hum Evol. 2017 Feb;103:53-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
The paleoanthropological significance of Klasies River Main Site derives from its abundant Middle Stone Age (MSA) archaeological debris and the hominin fossils that have featured in discussions about modern human emergence. Despite their significance, the human remains have yet to be contextualized within the spatial, stratigraphic and geochronological framework of the site. We provide an updated overview of the stratigraphy and geochronology of the site, and review the human fossil record in this context. We also provide the first anatomical interpretations of many of the cranial vault fragments. Five hominin specimens derive from the Upper Member and six from the lowermost LBS Member. The vast majority - nearly 40 cataloged specimens - come from the SAS Member; many of these are from a single stratigraphic horizon in a relatively small area in Cave 1. There is a strong cranial bias to the sample; just over 70% of skeletal remains are from the skull. The postcranial skeleton is poorly represented. Excluding the three metatarsals, there are only three long bones in the sample - a clavicle, a proximal radius, and a proximal ulna. Remarkably, humeral, femoral and tibial diaphyses, which are the most durable elements in terms of cortical bone thickness and density, are absent. However, the proportional representation of hominin remains is reminiscent of the "Klasies Pattern" shown by the MSA large bovid skeletal parts. To some degree, this may reflect the excavation and recovery methods that were employed. The vast bulk of the human fossils represent adults. Only three undoubted juvenile individuals are represented - each by a deciduous tooth. This contrasts with other MSA sites along the southern coast of South Africa, where human remains are predominantly juvenile, usually in the form of (possibly exfoliated) deciduous teeth. However, this apparent dissimilarity may also reflect different excavation techniques.
克拉西斯河主遗址的古人类学意义源于其丰富的中石器时代(MSA)考古遗迹以及在关于现代人类起源的讨论中备受关注的人类化石。尽管这些化石具有重要意义,但人类遗骸尚未在该遗址的空间、地层和地质年代框架中得到全面解读。我们提供了该遗址地层学和地质年代学的最新综述,并在此背景下回顾了人类化石记录。我们还对许多颅顶碎片进行了首次解剖学解读。五件人类标本来自上部地层单元,六件来自最下部的LBS地层单元。绝大多数标本——近40件编入目录的标本——来自SAS地层单元;其中许多来自1号洞穴相对较小区域内的一个单一地层层面。该样本存在强烈的颅骨偏向性;超过70%的骨骼遗骸来自头骨。颅后骨骼的代表性较差。除了三根跖骨外,样本中只有三根长骨——一根锁骨、一根桡骨近端和一根尺骨近端。值得注意的是,肱骨、股骨和胫骨的骨干,就皮质骨厚度和密度而言是最耐用的部分,却未发现。然而,人类遗骸的比例分布让人联想到MSA大型牛科动物骨骼部分所呈现的“克拉西斯模式”。在某种程度上,这可能反映了所采用的挖掘和回收方法。绝大多数人类化石代表成年人。只有三个无疑是幼年个体的标本——每个都是一颗乳牙。这与南非南部海岸的其他MSA遗址形成对比,在那些遗址中,人类遗骸主要是幼年个体,通常是(可能已脱落的)乳牙形式。然而,这种明显的差异也可能反映了不同的挖掘技术。