Suppr超能文献

躯体变形障碍(BDD)中的注意偏差:使用情绪斯特鲁普任务的眼动追踪。

Attentional biases in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD): Eye-tracking using the emotional Stroop task.

机构信息

Departments of Psychological Sciences and Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Brain and Psychological Sciences Research Centre, Swinburne University, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia; Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Level 4, 607 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Departments of Psychological Sciences and Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Department of Psychiatry, St. Vincent's Mental Health, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;74:151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is characterised by repetitive behaviours and/or mental acts occurring in response to preoccupations with perceived defects or flaws in physical appearance. This study aimed to examine attentional biases in BDD via the emotional Stroop task with two modifications: i) incorporating an eye-tracking paradigm, and ii) employing an obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) control group.

METHOD

Twenty-one BDD, 19 OCD and 21 HC participants, who were age-, sex-, and IQ-matched, were included. A card version of the emotional Stroop task was employed based on seven 10-word lists: (i) BDD-positive, (ii) BDD-negative, (iii) OCD-checking, (iv) OCD-washing, (v) general positive, (vi) general threat, and (vii) neutral (as baseline). Participants were asked to read aloud words and word colours consecutively, thereby yielding accuracy and latency scores. Eye-tracking parameters were also measured.

RESULTS

Participants with BDD exhibited significant Stroop interference for BDD-negative words relative to HC participants, as shown by extended colour-naming latencies. In contrast, the OCD group did not exhibit Stroop interference for OCD-related nor general threat words. Only mild eye-tracking anomalies were uncovered in clinical groups. Inspection of individual scanning styles and fixation heat maps however revealed that viewing strategies adopted by clinical groups were generally disorganised, with avoidance of certain disorder-relevant words and considerable visual attention devoted to non-salient card regions.

CONCLUSION

The operation of attentional biases to negative disorder-specific words was corroborated in BDD. Future replication studies using other paradigms are vital, given potential ambiguities inherent in emotional Stroop task interpretation.

摘要

目的

体像障碍(BDD)的特征是反复出现的行为和/或心理行为,这些行为是对感知到的外貌缺陷或瑕疵的关注而产生的。本研究旨在通过情绪 Stroop 任务来检验 BDD 的注意偏差,该任务有两个修改:i)纳入眼动追踪范式,ii)采用强迫症(OCD)对照组。

方法

共纳入 21 名 BDD、19 名 OCD 和 21 名 HC 参与者,他们在年龄、性别和智商方面匹配。采用卡片版情绪 Stroop 任务,共包含七个 10 字列表:(i)BDD 阳性,(ii)BDD 阴性,(iii)OCD 检查,(iv)OCD 清洗,(v)一般阳性,(vi)一般威胁,和(vii)中性(作为基线)。参与者被要求连续大声朗读单词和单词颜色,从而得出准确性和延迟分数。还测量了眼动追踪参数。

结果

与 HC 参与者相比,BDD 患者对 BDD 阴性单词表现出显著的 Stroop 干扰,表现为延长的颜色命名延迟。相比之下,OCD 组对与 OCD 相关的或一般威胁的单词没有表现出 Stroop 干扰。仅在临床组中发现了轻微的眼动追踪异常。但是,对个体扫描风格和注视热图的检查表明,临床组采用的观察策略通常是混乱的,避免了某些与疾病相关的单词,并将大量视觉注意力集中在非突出卡区域上。

结论

BDD 患者对负性疾病特异性单词的注意偏差得到了证实。鉴于情绪 Stroop 任务解释中固有的歧义,未来使用其他范式的复制研究至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验