Kvedaras Mindaugas, Minderis Petras, Fokin Andrej, Ratkevicius Aivaras, Venckunas Tomas, Lionikas Arimantas
Institute of Sport Science and Innovations, Lithuanian Sports University Kaunas, Lithuania.
School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK.
Front Physiol. 2017 Jan 23;8:9. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00009. eCollection 2017.
Phenotypic diversity between laboratory mouse strains provides a model for studying the underlying genetic mechanisms. The A/J strain performs poorly in various endurance exercise models. The aim of the study was to test if endurance capacity and contractility of the fast- and slow-twitch muscles are affected by the genes on mouse chromosome 10. The C57BL/6J (B6) strain and C57BL/6J-Chr 10/NaJ (B6.A10) consomic strain which carries the A/J chromosome 10 on a B6 strain background were compared. The B6.A10 mice compared to B6 were larger in body weight ( < 0.02): 27.2 ± 1.9 vs. 23.8 ± 2.7 and 23.4 ± 1.9 vs. 22.9 ± 2.3 g, for males and females, respectively, and in male soleus weight ( < 0.02): 9.7 ± 0.4 vs. 8.6 ± 0.9 mg. In the forced running test the B6.A10 mice completed only 64% of the B6 covered distance ( < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in voluntary wheel running ( = 0.6) or in fatigability of isolated soleus ( = 0.24) or extensor digitorum longus (EDL, = 0.7) muscles. We conclude that chromosome 10 of the A/J strain contributes to reduced endurance performance. We also discuss physiological mechanisms and methodological aspects relevant to interpretation of these findings.
实验室小鼠品系之间的表型多样性为研究潜在的遗传机制提供了一个模型。A/J品系在各种耐力运动模型中的表现较差。本研究的目的是测试小鼠10号染色体上的基因是否会影响快肌和慢肌的耐力和收缩能力。对C57BL/6J(B6)品系和C57BL/6J-Chr 10/NaJ(B6.A10)代换系进行了比较,B6.A10代换系在B6品系背景上携带A/J品系的10号染色体。与B6小鼠相比,B6.A10小鼠体重更大(<0.02):雄性分别为27.2±1.9克和23.8±2.7克,雌性分别为23.4±1.9克和22.9±2.3克;雄性比目鱼肌重量更大(<0.02):9.7±0.4毫克和8.6±0.9毫克。在强迫跑步试验中,B6.A10小鼠完成的距离仅为B6小鼠的64%(<0.0001)。然而,在自主轮转跑步(P = 0.6)或离体比目鱼肌(P = 0.24)或趾长伸肌(EDL,P = 0.7)肌肉的疲劳性方面没有差异。我们得出结论,A/J品系的10号染色体导致耐力表现降低。我们还讨论了与这些发现解释相关的生理机制和方法学方面的问题。