Venkatesh Yeduru, Munisamy Venkatesan, Ramakrishna Bheerappagari, Kumar Pippara Hemant, Mandal Haraprasad, Bangal Prakriti Ranjan
Inorganic and Physical Chemistry Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Uppal Road, Tarnaka, Hyderabad 500007, India.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Feb 15;19(7):5658-5673. doi: 10.1039/c6cp08520b.
The dynamics of photoinduced bimolecular reductive electron transfer between meso-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin (HFTPP), an acceptor (A), and five aromatic amines (donor (D)) with varying oxidation potentials (aniline (AN), N-methylaniline (MAN), N-ethylaniline (EAN), N,N-dimethylaniline (DMAN) and N,N-diethylaniline (DEAN)) in dichloromethane (DCM) as a solvent as well as in neat donor solvents were investigated by employing nanosecond to femtosecond time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy and femtosecond time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy upon S excitation of HFTPP. Systematic studies of time-resolved fluorescence quenching dependent on the donor concentration in the concentration range of 0.01-2 M and finally in neat donor solvents broadly enabled us to determine the electron transfer dynamics in three regimes of electron transfer: stationary or diffusion-controlled electron transfer, non-stationary electron transfer and intrinsic or ultrafast electron transfer. Depending upon the electron-donating ability of the studied donors, intrinsic electron transfer was found to occur in the time domain of ∼1-9 ps and diffusion-controlled ET dynamics was observed in the time domain of 200-500 ps, whereas the maximum limit of non-stationary electron transfer could be observed in the time domain of 15-50 ps. Femtosecond transient absorption studies together with global and target analysis helped to identify the spectral signature of the (HFTPP˙) radical anion as the product of ET. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first ever evidence that shows the spectra of an anion as the product of ET for any porphyrin-based electron transfer dynamics. However, transient absorption measurements confirm that intrinsic ET occurs in the Q state, whereas diffusion-controlled ET occurs in the hot Q as well as in the thermal equilibrium Q state. The most remarkable fact derived from the measurements of transient absorption was that the rate of the forward electron transfer (CS) is exactly the same as the rate of the backward electron transfer (CR) for all three regimes of ET. The thermodynamic driving force for CR was found to lie in the range of the total reorganization energy for the studied systems and hence falls in the Marcus optimal region, and the CR process is barrierless. The dependence on the driving force of the combination of forward and reverse electron transfer exhibited a bell-shaped curve for all three regimes of electron transfer, even though the rate of intrinsic ET is higher by a factor of ∼10 than that of diffusion-controlled ET. These results unambiguously favour the Marcus theory, in particular the controversial Marcus inverted region, of outer-sphere electron transfer.
以二氯甲烷(DCM)为溶剂以及在纯供体溶剂中,采用纳秒至飞秒时间分辨荧光光谱和飞秒时间分辨瞬态吸收光谱,研究了在HFTPP的S激发下,中位-四(五氟苯基)卟啉(HFTPP)、受体(A)与五种具有不同氧化电位的芳香胺(供体(D))(苯胺(AN)、N-甲基苯胺(MAN)、N-乙基苯胺(EAN)、N,N-二甲基苯胺(DMAN)和N,N-二乙基苯胺(DEAN))之间光诱导双分子还原电子转移的动力学。对0.01 - 2 M浓度范围内以及最终在纯供体溶剂中,依赖于供体浓度的时间分辨荧光猝灭进行系统研究,使我们能够大致确定电子转移三种机制中的电子转移动力学:稳态或扩散控制电子转移、非稳态电子转移以及本征或超快电子转移。根据所研究供体的给电子能力,发现本征电子转移发生在约1 - 9皮秒的时间域内,扩散控制的电子转移动力学在200 - 500皮秒的时间域内观察到,而非稳态电子转移的最大极限可在15 - 50皮秒的时间域内观察到。飞秒瞬态吸收研究以及全局和目标分析有助于确定作为电子转移产物的(HFTPP˙)自由基阴离子的光谱特征。据我们所知,这是首次有证据表明对于任何基于卟啉的电子转移动力学,阴离子光谱是电子转移的产物。然而,瞬态吸收测量证实本征电子转移发生在Q态,而扩散控制的电子转移发生在热Q态以及热平衡Q态。从瞬态吸收测量得出的最显著事实是,对于所有三种电子转移机制,正向电子转移(CS)的速率与反向电子转移(CR)的速率完全相同。发现CR的热力学驱动力在所研究系统的总重组能范围内,因此处于马库斯最优区域,并且CR过程无势垒。对于所有三种电子转移机制,正向和反向电子转移组合对驱动力的依赖性呈现出钟形曲线,尽管本征电子转移的速率比扩散控制电子转移的速率高约10倍。这些结果明确支持马库斯外层电子转移理论,特别是有争议的马库斯反转区域。