Jimbo Masahito, Sen Ananda, Plegue Melissa A, Hawley Sarah T, Kelly-Blake Karen, Rapai Mary, Zhang Minling, Zhang Yuhong, Ruffin Mack T
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Apr;52(4):443-450. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.026. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
Information is limited on patient characteristics that influence their preference among screening options and intent to be screened for colorectal cancer (CRC). A mechanistic pathway to intent and preference was examined through a formal mediation analysis.
From 2012 to 2014, a total of 570 adults aged 50-75 years were recruited from 15 primary care practices in Metro Detroit for a trial on decision aids for CRC screening. Confirmatory factor, regression, and mediation analyses were performed in 2015-2016 on baseline cross-sectional data. Main outcomes were patient intent and preference. Perceived risk and self-efficacy were secondary outcomes. Covariates included demographic information, health status, previous CRC screening experience, patient attitudes, and knowledge.
Mean age was 57.7 years, 56.1% were women, and 55.1% white and 36.6% black. Women had 32% and 41% lower odds than men of perceiving CRC to be high/moderate risk (OR=0.68, 95% CI=0.47, 0.97, p=0.03) and having high self-efficacy (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.42, 0.85, p=0.006), respectively. Whites had 63% and 47% lower odds than blacks of having high self-efficacy (OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.25, 0.57, p<0.001) and intent to undergo CRC screening (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.34, 0.84, p=0.007), respectively. Younger age, higher knowledge, lower level of test worries, and medium/high versus low self-efficacy increased the odds of intent of being screened. Self-efficacy, but not perceived risk, significantly mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient screening intent.
Self-efficacy mediated the association between race, attitude, and test worries and patient intent.
关于影响患者在筛查选项中的偏好以及结直肠癌(CRC)筛查意愿的患者特征,相关信息有限。通过正式的中介分析研究了意愿和偏好的作用机制途径。
2012年至2014年,从底特律都会区的15家初级保健机构招募了570名年龄在50 - 75岁的成年人,进行CRC筛查决策辅助工具的试验。2015 - 2016年对基线横断面数据进行了验证性因素分析、回归分析和中介分析。主要结局是患者的意愿和偏好。感知风险和自我效能感是次要结局。协变量包括人口统计学信息、健康状况、既往CRC筛查经历、患者态度和知识。
平均年龄为57.7岁,56.1%为女性,55.1%为白人,36.6%为黑人。女性认为CRC为高/中度风险(OR = 0.68,95% CI = 0.47,0.97,p = 0.03)和具有高自我效能感(OR = 0.59,95% CI = 0.42,0.85,p = 0.006)的几率分别比男性低32%和41%。白人具有高自我效能感(OR = 于黑人低63%和47%,进行CRC筛查的意愿(OR = 0.53,95% CI = 0.34,0.84,p = 0.007)。年龄较小、知识水平较高、检测担忧程度较低以及自我效能感为中/高而非低,会增加接受筛查的意愿几率。自我效能感而非感知风险,显著介导了种族、态度和检测担忧与患者筛查意愿之间的关联。
自我效能感介导了种族、态度和检测担忧与患者意愿之间的关联。