Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者丙型肝炎病毒感染的治疗和终末期肝病模型的预测价值:来自 Hepa-C 注册研究的数据分析。

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with cirrhosis and predictive value of model for end-stage liver disease: Analysis of data from the Hepa-C registry.

机构信息

Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, IDIPHIM, CIBERehd, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.

Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2017 Jun;65(6):1810-1822. doi: 10.1002/hep.29097. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are highly effective and well tolerated in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis. However, fewer data are available in patients with more advanced liver disease. Our retrospective, noninterventional, national, multicenter study in patients from the Spanish Hepa-C registry investigated the effectiveness and safety of interferon-free DAA regimens in patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis, in routine practice (all currently approved regimens were registered). Patients transplanted during treatment or within 12 weeks of completing treatment were excluded. Among 843 patients with cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh [CTP] class A, n = 564; CTP class B/C, n = 175), 90% achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Significant differences in SVR12 and relapse rates were observed between CTP class A and CTP class B/C patients (94% versus 78%, and 4% versus 14%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were more common in CTP class B/C versus CTP class A patients (50% versus 12%, respectively; P < 0.001). Incident decompensation was the most common serious adverse event (7% overall). Death rate during the study period was 16/843 (2%), significantly higher among CTP class B/C versus CTP class A patients (6.4% versus 0.9%; P < 0.001). Baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score alone (cut-off 18) was the best predictor of survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis receiving DAAs present lower response rates and experience more SAEs. In this setting, a MELD score ≥18 may help clinicians to identify those patients with a higher risk of complications and to individualize treatment decisions. (Hepatology 2017;65:1810-1822).

摘要

目的

直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)在慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染患者中具有高效和良好的耐受性,包括代偿性肝硬化患者。然而,在更晚期肝病患者中,数据较少。我们的回顾性、非干预性、全国性、多中心研究,对西班牙 Hepa-C 登记处的患者进行了研究,以评估无干扰素 DAA 方案在晚期肝病患者中的疗效和安全性,包括失代偿性肝硬化患者,这些患者是在常规实践中(所有目前批准的方案都已注册)。治疗期间或完成治疗后 12 周内接受移植的患者被排除在外。在 843 例肝硬化患者(Child-Turcotte-Pugh [CTP] 分级 A,n = 564;CTP 分级 B/C,n = 175)中,90%的患者在治疗后 12 周时达到持续病毒学应答(SVR12)。CTP 分级 A 和 CTP 分级 B/C 患者的 SVR12 和复发率有显著差异(94%对 78%,4%对 14%;均 P < 0.001)。CTP 分级 B/C 患者的严重不良事件(SAE)发生率高于 CTP 分级 A 患者(50%对 12%;均 P < 0.001)。最常见的严重不良事件是失代偿性肝损伤(总体发生率为 7%)。研究期间的死亡率为 16/843(2%),CTP 分级 B/C 患者显著高于 CTP 分级 A 患者(6.4%对 0.9%;均 P < 0.001)。基线终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分(截断值为 18)是生存的最佳预测因子。

结论

接受 DAA 治疗的失代偿性肝硬化患者的应答率较低,且发生 SAE 的风险较高。在这种情况下,MELD 评分≥18 可能有助于临床医生识别那些并发症风险较高的患者,并做出个体化的治疗决策。

相似文献

2
Baseline Factors Associated With Improvements in Decompensated Cirrhosis After Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jun;154(8):2111-2121.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
4
Concise review: Interferon-free treatment of hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis and liver graft infection.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov 7;22(41):9044-9056. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i41.9044.
5
DAA therapy and long-term hepatic function in advanced/decompensated cirrhosis: Real-world experience from HCV-TARGET cohort.
J Hepatol. 2020 Sep;73(3):540-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.031. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin for Treatment of HCV Infection in Patients With Advanced Liver Disease.
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):649-59. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15.
7
Predictors of functional benefit of hepatitis C therapy in a 'real-life' cohort.
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb 21;24(7):852-861. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i7.852.
9
Sofosbuvir and daclatasvir therapy in patients with hepatitis C-related advanced decompensated liver disease (MELD ≥ 15).
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;47(3):401-411. doi: 10.1111/apt.14404. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Clinical factors to predict changes of esophagogastric varices after sustained viral response with direct-acting antiviral therapy.
J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb;60(2):222-234. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02174-z. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Liver Cirrhosis After Eradication of Chronic Hepatitis C with Direct-Acting Antiviral Drugs (DAAs).
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Oct 30;11:2115-2132. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S475810. eCollection 2024.
5
Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Infection and Decompensated Cirrhosis.
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 May;69(5):1551-1561. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08393-x. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
7
Managing HBV and HCV Infection Pre- and Post-liver Transplant.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):101287. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.09.008. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
8
Longitudinal assessment of HCV core antigen kinetics to monitor therapeutic response in the age of DAAs.
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 17;18(2):e0282013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282013. eCollection 2023.
9
Evolution of care in cirrhosis: Preventing hepatic decompensation through pharmacotherapy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan 7;29(1):61-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i1.61.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验