研究中的 equipoise：在人体研究中整合伦理与科学。（注：equipoise 这个词在医学研究伦理语境中常译为“ equipoise原则”，指在研究中研究者对试验组和对照组的干预措施的利弊处于平衡状态，即没有足够的证据表明一种干预优于另一种干预，以保证研究的伦理合理性。但按要求只翻译字面内容） - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Equipoise in Research: Integrating Ethics and Science in Human Research.

作者信息

London Alex John

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):525-526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0016.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.0016

PMID:28170466

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Equipoise in Research: Integrating Ethics and Science in Human Research.

JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):525-526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0016.

The ethics of public policy RCTs: The principle of policy equipoise.

Bioethics. 2018 Jan;32(1):59-67. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12403. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

Research ethics for emerging trial designs: does equipoise need to adapt?

BMJ. 2018 Jan 25;360:k226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k226.

In search of equipoise.

JAMA. 2011 Mar 23;305(12):1234-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.363.

Moving from clinical to pragmatic equipoise in health policy and systems research.

Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct-Dec;V(4):1-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.77.

What do we talk about when we talk about "equipoise"? Stakeholder interviews assessing the use of equipoise in clinical research ethics.

Trials. 2023 Mar 18;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07221-3.

Clinical and research ethics as moral strangers.

Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2009 May-Jun;57(3):157-64. doi: 10.1007/s00005-009-0027-8. Epub 2009 May 29.

Equipoise, ethics, and the necessity of randomized trials in surgery.

Arch Surg. 2012 Oct;147(10):899-900. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1796.

Response to open peer commentaries on "What is the best standard for the standard of care in clinical research?".

Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):W7-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160902918804.

Response to 'Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle therapy'.

J Med Ethics. 2014 Aug;40(8):576-7. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102105. Epub 2014 May 7.

引用本文的文献

A Reconsideration of Small Sample Studies and Absence of Equipoise as Ethical Issues in Research.

Indian J Psychol Med. 2025 Mar;47(2):187-189. doi: 10.1177/02537176241310814. Epub 2025 Jan 19.

Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: palliative interventions outcomes - mixed-methods systematic review.

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e515-e527. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003492.

Bayes and the Evidence Base: Reanalyzing Trials Using Many Priors Does Not Contribute to Consensus.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 1;209(5):483-484. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202308-1455VP.

Is equipoise a useful concept to justify randomised controlled trials in the cultural context of Pakistan? A survey of clinicians in relation to a trial of talking therapy for young people who self-harm.

Trials. 2023 Aug 8;24(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07397-8.

How to Conduct a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Respir Care. 2023 Dec 28;69(1):128-138. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11351.

What do we talk about when we talk about "equipoise"? Stakeholder interviews assessing the use of equipoise in clinical research ethics.

Trials. 2023 Mar 18;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07221-3.

Reframing the perception of outliers and negative data in translational research.

Brain Res Bull. 2023 Jan;192:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Rethinking Benefits in Health Research, Reflections of an Ethics Committee.

Yale J Biol Med. 2022 Sep 30;95(3):389-398. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Cross-roads for meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of therapy.

Gut. 2022 Mar;71(3):643-650. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326170. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

Current COVID-19 vaccine trials in high-income countries: are placebo-controlled trials ethical?

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Nov;27(11):1565-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验