Bouquet Jerome, Gardy Jennifer L, Brown Scott, Pfeil Jacob, Miller Ruth R, Morshed Muhammad, Avina-Zubieta Antonio, Shojania Kam, McCabe Mark, Parker Shoshana, Uyaguari Miguel, Federman Scot, Tang Patrick, Steiner Ted, Otterstater Michael, Holt Rob, Moore Richard, Chiu Charles Y, Patrick David M
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Communicable Disease Prevention and Control Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;64(4):476-481. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw767.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) remains poorly understood. Although infections are speculated to trigger the syndrome, a specific infectious agent and underlying pathophysiological mechanism remain elusive. In a previous study, we described similar clinical phenotypes in CFS patients and alternatively diagnosed chronic Lyme syndrome (ADCLS) patients—individuals diagnosed with Lyme disease by testing from private Lyme specialty laboratories but who test negative by reference 2-tiered serologic analysis.
Here, we performed blinded RNA-seq analysis of whole blood collected from 25 adults diagnosed with CFS and 13 ADCLS patients, comparing these cases to 25 matched controls and 11 patients with well-controlled systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Samples were collected at patient enrollment and not during acute symptom flares. RNA-seq data were used to study host gene expression, B-cell/T-cell receptor profiles (BCR/TCR), and potential viral infections.
No differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to be significant when CFS or ADCLS cases were compared to controls. Forty-two DEGs were found when SLE cases were compared to controls, consistent with activation of interferon signaling pathways associated with SLE disease. BCR/TCR repertoire analysis did not show significant differences between CFS and controls or ADCLS and controls. Finally, viral sequences corresponding to anelloviruses, human pegivirus 1, herpesviruses, and papillomaviruses were detected in RNA-seq data, but proportions were similar (P = .73) across all genus-level taxonomic categories.
Our observations do not support a theory of transcriptionally mediated immune cell dysregulation in CFS and ADCLS, at least outside of periods of acute symptom flares.
慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)仍未得到充分理解。尽管推测感染会引发该综合征,但具体的感染因子和潜在的病理生理机制仍不明确。在之前的一项研究中,我们描述了CFS患者和交替诊断的慢性莱姆综合征(ADCLS)患者的相似临床表型——这些个体通过私立莱姆病专科实验室检测被诊断为莱姆病,但通过参考两级血清学分析检测呈阴性。
在此,我们对从25名被诊断为CFS的成年人和13名ADCLS患者采集的全血进行了盲法RNA测序分析,将这些病例与25名匹配的对照以及11名系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)病情得到良好控制的患者进行比较。样本在患者入组时采集,而非在急性症状发作期间采集。RNA测序数据用于研究宿主基因表达、B细胞/T细胞受体谱(BCR/TCR)以及潜在的病毒感染。
将CFS或ADCLS病例与对照进行比较时,未发现有差异表达基因(DEG)具有显著性。将SLE病例与对照进行比较时,发现了42个DEG,这与SLE疾病相关的干扰素信号通路激活一致。BCR/TCR库分析未显示CFS与对照或ADCLS与对照之间存在显著差异。最后,在RNA测序数据中检测到了与环病毒、人pegivirus 1、疱疹病毒和乳头瘤病毒相对应的病毒序列,但所有属级分类类别中的比例相似(P = 0.73)。
我们的观察结果不支持CFS和ADCLS中存在转录介导的免疫细胞失调理论,至少在急性症状发作期之外不支持。