Lee Hae Won, Suh Kyung-Suk
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 23;47(2):93-100. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw168.
The Milan criteria are still considered the gold standard for patient selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, those criteria may be too strict and thus exclude a significant number of patients who could benefit from liver transplantation. Based on this notion, many expanded selection criteria have been suggested. In Asian countries, where there is a serious shortage of deceased donor organs, living donor liver transplantation accounts for the majority of all liver transplant cases. Because living donor liver transplantation is not controlled by the public allocation system, the indications for living donor liver transplantation can be expanded. In Korea, living donor liver transplantation depends entirely on the discretion of the transplant team and the donor. Hence, Korean transplant centers have had a reasonable amount of experience with liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Experiences in Korea show that serum alpha-fetoprotein level, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level and positron emission tomography are very useful biomarkers in predicting tumor recurrence after transplantation. Tumors that show favorable levels of these biomarkers might not recur after transplantation despite being morphologically advanced. In addition, combination therapy with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and sorafenib may improve survival even after tumor recurrence. Therefore, in Korea, living donor liver transplantation is considered even for cases of far advanced hepatocellular carcinoma if a recipient has no other effective treatment options and a well-informed donor wishes to willingly participate.
米兰标准仍然被认为是肝细胞癌患者肝移植患者选择标准的金标准。然而,这些标准可能过于严格,从而排除了大量可能从肝移植中受益的患者。基于这一观念,人们提出了许多扩展的选择标准。在亚洲国家,由于尸体供肝严重短缺,活体供肝移植占所有肝移植病例的大多数。因为活体供肝移植不受公共分配系统的控制,所以活体供肝移植的适应证可以扩大。在韩国,活体供肝移植完全取决于移植团队和供体的决定。因此,韩国的移植中心在晚期肝细胞癌肝移植方面有相当丰富的经验。韩国的经验表明,血清甲胎蛋白水平、异常凝血酶原水平和正电子发射断层扫描在预测移植后肿瘤复发方面是非常有用的生物标志物。尽管形态学上已属晚期,但这些生物标志物水平良好的肿瘤在移植后可能不会复发。此外,即使在肿瘤复发后,雷帕霉素靶蛋白抑制剂与索拉非尼的联合治疗也可能提高生存率。因此,在韩国,如果受体没有其他有效的治疗选择且知情的供体愿意自愿参与,即使是晚期肝细胞癌病例也会考虑进行活体供肝移植。