Olgan Safak, Humaidan Peter
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, 07059 Antalya, Turkey.
The Fertility Clinic, Fertility, Skive Regional Hospital, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Resenvej 25, 7800 Skive, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;17(1):105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
The current study aimed to investigate the effects of luteal gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist pretreatment on the outcomes of diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) patients who were treated using a FSH/letrozole/GnRH antagonist (FLA) protocol. Thus, patients who had luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment (AFLA) prior to stimulation were compared to patients who had the FLA protocol, only. An electronic database was used to identify patients and stimulation characteristics. Women who had a total antral follicle count (AFC) of <7 were included in the analysis. A total of 45 cycles using luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment in combination with a letrozole/GnRH antagonist (AFLA) protocol were compared to 76 cycles using a FLA protocol, only. The total gonadotropin dose, duration of stimulation, and peak estradiol levels were comparable between the groups (p>0.05). However, the AFLA group had significantly more metaphase-2 (MII) oocytes (p=0.009), a higher oocyte maturity rate (MII/total oocytes) (p=0.029), and a higher mature oocyte yield (MII/AFC) (p=0.020) with more cleaved embryos (p=0.036), and a significantly reduced number of canceled cycles (26.7% vs. 44.7%; p=0.048). The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 22.2% vs. 13.2% (p=0.195) in the AFLA and FLA groups, respectively. Interestingly, a subgroup analysis including ESHRE Bologna criteria poor responder patients showed that the luteal administration of GnRH antagonist resulted in better outcomes when compared with the FLA protocol alone. In conclusion, luteal GnRH antagonist pretreatment improves ovarian stimulation parameters and reproductive outcomes in poor ovarian reserve IVF patients.
本研究旨在探讨黄体期促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂预处理对卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者采用促卵泡生成素/来曲唑/GnRH拮抗剂(FLA)方案治疗结局的影响。因此,将刺激前接受黄体期GnRH拮抗剂预处理(AFLA)的患者与仅采用FLA方案的患者进行比较。使用电子数据库识别患者和刺激特征。分析纳入了总窦卵泡计数(AFC)<7的女性。将45个使用黄体期GnRH拮抗剂预处理联合来曲唑/GnRH拮抗剂(AFLA)方案的周期与76个仅使用FLA方案的周期进行比较。两组之间的总促性腺激素剂量、刺激持续时间和雌二醇峰值水平相当(p>0.05)。然而,AFLA组有显著更多的中期-2(MII)卵母细胞(p=0.009)、更高的卵母细胞成熟率(MII/总卵母细胞)(p=0.029)和更高的成熟卵母细胞产量(MII/AFC)(p=0.020),有更多的分裂胚(p=0.036),且取消周期数显著减少(26.7%对44.7%;p=0.048)。AFLA组和FLA组每周期的临床妊娠率分别为22.2%和13.2%(p=0.195)。有趣的是,一项纳入ESHRE博洛尼亚标准的低反应患者的亚组分析显示,与单独的FLA方案相比,黄体期给予GnRH拮抗剂可带来更好的结局。总之,黄体期GnRH拮抗剂预处理可改善卵巢储备功能差的体外受精患者的卵巢刺激参数和生殖结局。