• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient satisfaction with out-patient rehabilitation therapy: validity and reliability.患者对门诊康复治疗的满意度:效度与信度
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3354-3356. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3354. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
2
Development of a questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with medical encounters.开发一份用于评估患者对医疗就诊满意度的问卷。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2006 Dec;210(4):373-81. doi: 10.1620/tjem.210.373.
3
Development and validation of an audit instrument: the Prostate Outcomes Questionnaire.
Br J Urol. 1998 Jul;82(1):49-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00670.x.
4
Psychometric testing of an instrument designed to measure nutritional perceptions of hypertensive patients.一种用于测量高血压患者营养认知的工具的心理测量测试。
J Educ Health Promot. 2014 Aug 28;3:91. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.139662. eCollection 2014.
5
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
6
Development and validation of the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Questionnaire.膀胱过度活动症满意度(OAB-S)问卷的编制与验证
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(3):179-90. doi: 10.1002/nau.20455.
7
Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments.一份用于测量门诊患者对医院咨询科室质量看法的问卷的构建。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Aug 4;2:43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-43.
8
A new functional status outcome measure of dyspnea and anxiety for adults with lung disease: the dyspnea management questionnaire.一种针对成年肺病患者的呼吸困难和焦虑的新功能状态结局测量方法:呼吸困难管理问卷。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):395-404. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200611000-00010.
9
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷简体中文版对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者的信度和效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273.
10
The Patient Needs in Asthma Treatment (NEAT) questionnaire: Further evidence on its psychometric properties.哮喘治疗中的患者需求(NEAT)问卷:其心理测量学特性的更多证据。
Allergy. 2019 Aug;74(8):1511-1521. doi: 10.1111/all.13782. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a self-care program satisfaction questionnaire for cardiovascular patients in Iran.伊朗心血管疾病患者自我护理计划满意度调查问卷的编制
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2018;10(1):24-27. doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2018.04. Epub 2018 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving quality in healthcare: What makes a satisfied patient?提高医疗质量:是什么造就了满意的患者?
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
2
Development and validation of an in-patient satisfaction questionnaire.住院患者满意度调查问卷的编制与验证
Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Dec;17(6):465-72. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi067. Epub 2005 Aug 12.
3
The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature.医疗保健满意度的测量:基于文献系统评价对实践的启示
Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(32):1-244. doi: 10.3310/hta6320.
4
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications.《斯坦福健康评估问卷:维度与实际应用》
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Jun 9;1:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-20.
5
Patients' experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care.患者对医疗保健的体验与满意度:一项关于特定护理方面的问卷调查结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):335-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.335.
6
Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation.患者对门诊物理治疗的满意度:工具验证
Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):557-65.
7
A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity.用于衡量质量改进的患者调查系统:问卷的信度和效度
Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):834-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008.

患者对门诊康复治疗的满意度:效度与信度

Patient satisfaction with out-patient rehabilitation therapy: validity and reliability.

作者信息

Lee Dae-Hee, Park Se-Yeon, Ha Ji Sun

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation, On Hospital: 721 Gayadearo, Busan, Gyeongsangnamdo, Republic of Korea.

College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3354-3356. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3354. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1589/jpts.28.3354
PMID:28174450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5276759/
Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of present study were to develop an out-patient satisfaction questionnaire to be used in health care system, from which the underlying dimensions could be derived and individual patient scores calculated, and to evaluate some of the questionnaire's psychometric properties. [Subjects and Methods] Forty out-patient of local hospital reply both the questionnaire used in previous study and newly designed questionnaire. To identifying validity, the statistical linear relationship between the total score of the primary questionnaire and newly designed questionnaire, which were analyzed. The test-retest reliability has been investigated by using a single measure intra class correlation. [Results] The average satisfaction of the previous questionnaire were significantly correlated with newly designed questionnaire. The intra-lass correlation coefficient of the each items of newly designed questionnaire were strong. Total score of the previous questionnaire had the lowest test-retest reliability, Cronbach' s alpha coefficient for the newly designed questionnaire score showed acceptable inter-item reliability. [Conclusion] The out-patients' satisfaction questionnaire developed in present study, which had appropriate validity, reliability, and acceptability.

摘要

[目的]本研究的目的是开发一种用于医疗保健系统的门诊患者满意度调查问卷,从中可以得出潜在维度并计算个体患者得分,并评估该问卷的一些心理测量特性。[对象与方法]当地医院的40名门诊患者同时回复了先前研究中使用的问卷和新设计的问卷。为确定效度,分析了原始问卷总分与新设计问卷总分之间的统计线性关系。通过单测量组内相关分析来研究重测信度。[结果]先前问卷的平均满意度与新设计问卷显著相关。新设计问卷各项目的组内相关系数较强。先前问卷总分的重测信度最低,新设计问卷得分的克朗巴赫α系数显示出可接受的项目间信度。[结论]本研究开发的门诊患者满意度调查问卷具有适当的效度、信度和可接受性。