Suppr超能文献

医保覆盖人群在高未参保率地区急诊就诊时需支付更高费用吗?

Do People with Health Insurance Coverage Who Live in Areas with High Uninsurance Rates Pay More for Emergency Department Visits?

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Financing, Access and Cost Trends, Rockville, MD.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):768-786. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12659. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between the percent uninsured in a county and expenditures associated with the typical emergency department visit.

DATA SOURCES

The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey linked to county-level data from the American Community Survey, the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and the Area Health Resources Files.

STUDY DESIGN

We use a nationally representative sample of emergency department visits that took place between 2009 and 2013 to estimate the association between the percent uninsured in counties and the amount paid for a typical visit. Final estimates come from a diagnosis-level fixed-effects model, with additional controls for a wide variety of visit, individual, and county characteristics.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among those with private insurance, we find that an increase of 1 percentage point in the county uninsurance rate is associated with a $20 increase in the mean emergency department payment. No such association is observed among visits covered by other insurance types.

CONCLUSIONS

Results provide tentative evidence that the costs associated with high uninsurance rates spill over to those with insurance, but future research needs to replicate these findings with longitudinal data and methods before drawing causal conclusions. Recent data on changes in area uninsurance rates following the ACA's insurance expansions and subsequent changes in emergency department expenditures afford a valuable opportunity to do this.

摘要

目的

调查县的未参保百分比与典型急诊科就诊相关支出之间的关系。

数据来源

使用 2009 年至 2013 年间进行的全国代表性急诊就诊样本,将医疗支出面板调查与美国社区调查、医疗保健成本和利用项目以及区域卫生资源档案中的县级数据相关联。

研究设计

我们使用诊断水平固定效应模型来估计县未参保百分比与典型就诊费用之间的关系,该模型还额外控制了各种就诊、个体和县级特征。

主要发现

在拥有私人保险的人群中,我们发现县未参保率每增加 1 个百分点,急诊支付的平均费用就会增加 20 美元。在其他保险类型覆盖的就诊中,没有观察到这种关联。

结论

结果提供了初步证据表明,高未参保率相关的成本会蔓延到有保险的人群,但在得出因果结论之前,需要使用纵向数据和方法对这些发现进行复制,随后观察 ACA 保险扩张后地区未参保率的变化以及急诊就诊支出的变化,这为进行这项研究提供了宝贵的机会。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Can supplementary private health insurance further supplement health.补充私人医疗保险能否进一步补充健康。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 27;10:961019. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.961019. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

6
How much do hospitals cost shift? A review of the evidence.医院轮班成本是多少?证据综述。
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):90-130. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00621.x.
10
Spillovers and vulnerability: the case of community uninsurance.溢出效应与脆弱性:社区未参保情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1304-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1304.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验