Caughey Gillian E, Tait Kirsty, Vitry Agnes I, Shakib Sepehr
Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal Adelaide Hospital.
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Jan 21;11:131-140. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S118836. eCollection 2017.
Multimorbidity is associated with use of multiple medicines, increased risk of adverse events and treatment conflicts. This study aimed to examine how older patients with multimorbidity and clinicians balance the benefits and harms associated with a medication and in the presence of competing health outcomes. Interviews were conducted with 15 participants aged ≥65 years with 2 or more chronic conditions. Three clinical scenarios were presented to understand patient preference to take a medicine according to i) degree of benefit, ii) type of adverse event and impact on daily living and iii) influence of comorbid conditions as competing health outcomes. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with participants (n=15) and clinicians (n=5) to understand patient preferences and treatment decisions, in the setting of multimorbidity. The median age of participants was 79 years, 55% had 5 or more conditions and 47% took 8 or more medicines daily. When the level of benefit of the medicine ranged from 14% to 70%, 80% of participants chose to take the medicine, but when adverse effects were present, this was reduced to 0-33% depending upon impact on daily activities. In the presence of competing health outcomes, 13%-26% of patients chose to take the medicine. Two-thirds of patients reported that their doctor respects and considers their preferences and discussed medication benefits and harms. Interviews with clinicians showed that their overall approach to treatment decision-making for older individuals with multimorbidity was based upon 2 main factors, the patients' prognosis and their preferences. The degree of benefit gained was not the driver of patients' preference to take a medicine; rather, this decision was influenced by type and severity of adverse effects. Inclusion of patient preferences in the setting of risks and benefits of medicines with consideration and prioritization of competing health outcomes may result in improved health outcomes for people with multimorbidity.
共病与多种药物的使用、不良事件风险增加及治疗冲突相关。本研究旨在探讨患有多种疾病的老年患者与临床医生如何在存在相互竞争的健康结局的情况下平衡与药物相关的利弊。对15名年龄≥65岁、患有2种或更多慢性疾病的参与者进行了访谈。呈现了三种临床情景,以了解患者根据以下因素服药的偏好:i)获益程度;ii)不良事件类型及其对日常生活的影响;iii)共病作为相互竞争的健康结局的影响。还对参与者(n = 15)和临床医生(n = 5)进行了半结构化访谈,以了解在共病情况下患者的偏好和治疗决策。参与者的中位年龄为79岁,55%的人患有5种或更多疾病,47%的人每天服用8种或更多药物。当药物的获益水平在14%至70%之间时,80%的参与者选择服药,但当存在不良反应时,这一比例根据对日常活动的影响降至0 - 33%。在存在相互竞争的健康结局时,13% - 26%的患者选择服药。三分之二的患者报告称,他们的医生尊重并考虑他们的偏好,并讨论了药物的利弊。对临床医生的访谈表明,他们对患有多种疾病的老年人进行治疗决策的总体方法基于两个主要因素,即患者的预后和他们的偏好。获得的获益程度并非患者服药偏好的驱动因素;相反,这一决定受不良反应的类型和严重程度影响。在考虑药物风险和获益并对相互竞争的健康结局进行优先级排序的情况下纳入患者偏好,可能会改善患有多种疾病的患者的健康结局。