Kalivoda J R, Jones C K, Stark C R
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jan;95(1):113-119. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.0966.
The determination of particle size is an important quality control measurement for feed manufacturers, nutritionists, and producers. The current approved method for determining the geometric mean diameter by weight (d) and geometric standard deviation (S) of grains is standard ANSI/ASAE S319.4. This method controls many variables, including the suggested quantity of initial material and the type, number, and size of sieves. However, the method allows for variations in sieving time, sieve agitators, and the use of a dispersion agent. The objective of this experiment was to determine which method of particle size analysis best estimated the particle size of various cereal grain types. Eighteen samples of either corn, sorghum, or wheat were ground and analyzed using different variations of the approved method. Treatments were arranged in a 5 × 3 factorial arrangement with 5 sieving methods: 1) 10-min sieving time with sieve agitators and no dispersion agent, 2) 10-min sieving time with sieve agitators and dispersion agent, 3) 15-min sieving time with no sieve agitators or dispersion agent, 4) 15-min sieving time with sieve agitators and no dispersion agent, and 5) 15-min sieving time with sieve agitators and dispersion agent conducted in 3 grain types (ground corn, sorghum, and wheat) with 4 replicates per treatment. The analytical method that resulted in the lowest d and greatest S was considered desirable because it was presumably representative of increased movement of particles to their appropriate sieve. Analytical method affected d and S ( ≤ 0.05) measured by both standards. Inclusion of sieve agitators and dispersion agent in the sieve stack resulted in the lowest d, regardless of sieving time. Inclusion of dispersion agent reduced d ( ≤ 0.05) by 32 and 36 µm when shaken for 10 and 15 min, respectively, compared to the same sample analyzed without dispersion agent. The addition of the dispersion agent also increased S. The dispersion agent increased the quantity of very fine particles collected in the pan; therefore, S was significantly greater ( ≤ 0.05). Corn and sorghum ground using the same mill parameters had similar d ( > 0.05), but wheat ground using the same mill parameters was 120 to 104 µm larger ( ≤ 0.05) than corn and sorghum, respectively. Both sieve agitators and dispersion agent should be included when conducting particle size analysis. The results indicate that 10 and 15 min of sieving time produced similar results.
粒度测定对于饲料制造商、营养学家和生产商而言是一项重要的质量控制指标。目前,用于测定谷物重量几何平均直径(d)和几何标准差(S)的认可方法是标准ANSI/ASAE S319.4。该方法控制了许多变量,包括初始物料的建议量以及筛网的类型、数量和尺寸。然而,该方法允许在筛分时间、筛网搅拌器以及分散剂的使用方面存在差异。本实验的目的是确定哪种粒度分析方法能最准确地估算各种谷物类型的粒度。将18个玉米、高粱或小麦样本进行研磨,并使用认可方法的不同变体进行分析。处理方式采用5×3析因设计,有5种筛分方法:1)筛分时间为10分钟,使用筛网搅拌器且不使用分散剂;2)筛分时间为10分钟,使用筛网搅拌器且使用分散剂;3)筛分时间为15分钟,不使用筛网搅拌器和分散剂;4)筛分时间为15分钟,使用筛网搅拌器且不使用分散剂;5)筛分时间为15分钟,使用筛网搅拌器且使用分散剂。实验针对3种谷物类型(磨碎的玉米、高粱和小麦)进行,每个处理重复4次。导致最低d值和最高S值的分析方法被认为是理想的,因为这可能代表颗粒向其合适筛网的移动增加。分析方法对两种标准测量的d和S均有影响(P≤0.05)。无论筛分时间如何,在筛网堆中加入筛网搅拌器和分散剂会导致最低的d值。与未使用分散剂分析的相同样本相比,加入分散剂后,分别在摇晃10分钟和15分钟时,d值降低了32微米和36微米(P≤0.05)。分散剂的添加也增加了S值。分散剂增加了收集在底盘中的极细颗粒数量;因此,S值显著更高(P≤0.05)。使用相同研磨参数研磨的玉米和高粱具有相似的d值(P>0.05),但使用相同研磨参数研磨的小麦分别比玉米和高粱大120至104微米(P≤0.05)。进行粒度分析时应同时包括筛网搅拌器和分散剂。结果表明,10分钟和15分钟的筛分时间产生了相似的结果。