• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[吸引瓶医院感染风险的微生物学方面]

[Microbiological aspects of nosocomial risks of suction bottles].

作者信息

Vassal S, Mager G, Massot J, Maisonnet M

出版信息

Ann Chir. 1989;43(6):465-8.

PMID:2817747
Abstract

The suction and collection of more or less contaminated biological fluids or regurgitated matter in reusable glass bottles may be responsible for nosocomial infections. Based on a study conducted in 49 cases, the authors try to demonstrate the microbiological risks in the operating theatre of changing and transport of these bottles and the risks for the environment and the hospital staff in the cleaning of these bottles. The connection to the vacuum system was found to be contaminated in 26.1% of cases, the environment of the waste evacuation and cleaning zone was contaminated in 59.2% of cases and, in 28.6% of cases, the microorganism detected was identical to that in the bottle. All of these factors suggest that a disposable system, although apparently more expensive, ensures a greater degree of safety, avoiding the problems related to transport emptying and elimination of these bottles.

摘要

在可重复使用的玻璃瓶中抽吸和收集或多或少受到污染的生物液体或反流物可能会导致医院感染。基于对49例病例的研究,作者试图证明在手术室更换和运输这些瓶子时的微生物风险,以及清洗这些瓶子时对环境和医院工作人员的风险。发现26.1%的病例中与真空系统的连接处受到污染,59.2%的病例中废物排放和清洁区域的环境受到污染,28.6%的病例中检测到的微生物与瓶子中的微生物相同。所有这些因素表明,一次性系统虽然表面上更昂贵,但能确保更高的安全程度,避免与这些瓶子的运输、排空和处理相关的问题。

相似文献

1
[Microbiological aspects of nosocomial risks of suction bottles].[吸引瓶医院感染风险的微生物学方面]
Ann Chir. 1989;43(6):465-8.
2
Cost-effectiveness and safety of reusable tracheal suction tubes.可重复使用气管吸痰管的成本效益与安全性
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88 Suppl 10:S86-8.
3
Infection risks from electrically operated breast pumps.电动吸奶器的感染风险。
J Hosp Infect. 1989 Jan;13(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(89)90092-3.
4
[Microbiological aspects of nosocomial risks of aspiration flasks].[吸痰瓶医院感染风险的微生物学方面]
Soins Chir. 1989 Jun-Jul(100-101):47-50.
5
Infection control. Suction waste management in hospitals and nursing homes.感染控制。医院和养老院的吸引物废物管理。
J Environ Health. 1989 Mar-Apr;51(4):212-5.
6
Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: a meta-analysis.机械通气重症监护患者的开放式与封闭式气管内吸痰系统:一项荟萃分析
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):260-70. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251126.45980.E8.
7
Manual cleaning of endoscopes: a comparison study of syringe versus suction methods using the endo-suction cleaning system.内镜手动清洗:使用内镜吸引清洗系统对比注射器法与吸引法的研究
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(2):69-74.
8
Bacterial contamination of dental chair units in a modern dental hospital caused by leakage from suction system hoses containing extensive biofilm.一家现代化牙科医院的牙科治疗椅单元因含有大量生物膜的抽吸系统软管泄漏而受到细菌污染。
J Hosp Infect. 2005 Apr;59(4):348-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.001.
9
Suction during orthopaedic surgery. How safe is the suction tip?骨科手术中的抽吸。抽吸头有多安全?
Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Aug;74(4):531-3.
10
Suction regulators: a potential vector for hospital-acquired pathogens.吸引调节器:医院获得性病原体的潜在载体。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;31(7):772-4. doi: 10.1086/653820.