Hosseinzadeh Pooya, Kiebzak Gary M, Dolan Lori, Zionts Lewis E, Morcuende Jose
Miami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute, Baptist Children's Hospital.
Pediatric Orthopedic Center, Baptist Children's Hospital, Miami, FL.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jan;39(1):38-41. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000953.
Despite the high rate of initial success using the Ponseti method to manage idiopathic clubfoot deformity, relapse continues to be a problem. We surveyed the Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America (POSNA) members about their experience with relapsed deformity following the initial correction of clubfeet.
We created a survey to focus on the management of clubfeet after initial correction of deformity. The survey included questions on postcorrective bracing, clinical findings used to identify relapse, the observed frequency of relapsed deformity, and how relapses are managed. The questionnaire was approved by the POSNA Evidence Based Committee and was sent electronically to all POSNA members.
We received responses from 321 members (26%). Of those, 94% were fellowship trained in pediatric orthopaedics. The Ponseti method was used by 98% of respondents. The Mitchell-Ponseti orthosis was most commonly used (51%), followed by the Denis-Browne brace (25%). The duration of bracing used varied among members with 23% recommending only 2 years, 33% recommending 3 years, and 34% recommending 4 years. A tight heel cord was felt to be the first sign of relapse by 59% of respondents, and dynamic supination by 30%. The rate of relapse was observed to be <10% by 22% of the respondents, 10% to 20% by 52%, and 20% to 40% by 25%. Manipulation and cast treatment alone (55%) and cast treatment with tenotomy (23%) were reported as the 2 most common initial treatment approaches for a relapsed deformity. Cast treatment to correct relapsed deformity before tibialis anterior tendon transfer was reported by 62% of respondents. Heel cord tenotomy (75%) and posterior capsular release (43%) were the 2 most common procedures used in addition to tibialis anterior tendon transfer for the treatment of clubfoot relapse.
This study highlights the wide variation with which clubfoot relapses are evaluated and treated among the POSNA membership with differences in the recommended duration of bracing, identification of relapses, and their management. These wide differences highlight the need for future research and educational programs to inform and standardize the management of clubfoot using the Ponseti Method.
Not applicable.
尽管使用庞塞蒂方法治疗特发性马蹄内翻足畸形的初始成功率很高,但复发仍然是一个问题。我们就北美小儿骨科学会(POSNA)成员对马蹄内翻足初次矫正后畸形复发的治疗经验进行了调查。
我们设计了一项针对畸形初次矫正后马蹄内翻足治疗情况的调查。调查问题包括矫正后支具治疗、用于识别复发的临床发现、观察到的畸形复发频率以及复发如何处理。问卷经POSNA循证委员会批准,并以电子方式发送给所有POSNA成员。
我们收到了321名成员(26%)的回复。其中,94%接受过小儿骨科专科培训。98%的受访者使用庞塞蒂方法。最常用的是米切尔 - 庞塞蒂矫形器(51%),其次是丹尼斯 - 布朗支具(25%)。支具使用时长在成员中各不相同,23%的人建议仅使用2年,33%的人建议使用3年,34%的人建议使用4年。59%的受访者认为足跟腱紧张是复发的首要迹象,30%的人认为是动态内旋。22%的受访者观察到复发率<10%,52%的人观察到复发率为10%至20%,25%的人观察到复发率为20%至40%。单独手法和石膏治疗(55%)以及石膏加跟腱切断术治疗(23%)被报告为复发畸形最常见的两种初始治疗方法。62%的受访者报告在胫前肌腱转移前采用石膏治疗矫正复发畸形。除胫前肌腱转移外,足跟腱切断术(75%)和后关节囊松解术(43%)是治疗马蹄内翻足复发最常用的两种手术。
本研究突出了POSNA成员在马蹄内翻足复发评估和治疗方面的广泛差异,包括推荐的支具使用时长、复发的识别及其处理。这些巨大差异凸显了未来开展研究和教育项目以指导和规范使用庞塞蒂方法治疗马蹄内翻足的必要性。
不适用。