Sax Oliver C, Hlukha Larysa P, Herzenberg John E, McClure Philip K
Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute of Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 W. Belvedere Ave., Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
International Center for Limb Lengthening, Rubin Institute of Advanced Orthopedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 W. Belvedere Ave., Baltimore, MD 21215, USA.
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;10(3):439. doi: 10.3390/children10030439.
Clubfoot management has advanced in the 21st century with increases in formal training, practitioner experience, and improved casting/bracing constructs. The Ponseti method is the gold standard, yet variations in application persist. This survey aims to identify current treatment practices among clubfoot practitioners within the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA). A 23-question online survey of members was conducted between June and August 2021. Eighty-nine respondents self-identified as clubfoot providers. Of these, 93.1% had an MD degree, 23.6% possessed >30 years' experience, and the majority (65.6%) worked in a teaching hospital associated with a medical school. Most responders (92.0%) were pediatric fellowship trained. A total of 51.7% had participated in a clubfoot training course. More than half (57.5%) noted changes to clubfoot management practices throughout their training. A majority used between four and seven (88.7%) long leg casts (98.4%), changed at seven-day intervals (93.4%). Plaster (69.4%) was most commonly used. The most common bracing device was Mitchell-Ponseti (72.9%). A mean 84.8% of clubfeet required tenotomy. The most common anesthetic agent was numbing gel (43.0%). Tenotomies mostly occurred in patients aged <6 months (63.1%). Tenotomy locations were operating room (46.5%), clinic (45.4%) and procedure room (8.1%). Cast removal was primarily performed with saws (54.7%). The mean incidence of observed cast burns was 5.5%. Most providers did not use a device to prevent cast burns (76.6%). Reported cast complications included slippage (85.9%), skin irritation (75.8%), and saw-related injuries (35.9%). Clubfoot management variations exist in orthotics, tenotomy indications and practices, and cast material. Casting complications continue to be a problem. Further studies are warranted to determine if certain practices predispose patients to specific complications.
21世纪,随着正规培训的增加、从业者经验的积累以及石膏固定/支具结构的改进,马蹄内翻足的治疗取得了进展。庞塞蒂方法是金标准,但在应用方面仍存在差异。本次调查旨在确定北美小儿骨科学会(POSNA)内马蹄内翻足从业者目前的治疗方法。2021年6月至8月对会员进行了一项包含23个问题的在线调查。89名受访者自称是马蹄内翻足治疗提供者。其中,93.1%拥有医学博士学位,23.6%有超过30年的经验,大多数(65.6%)在与医学院相关的教学医院工作。大多数受访者(92.0%)接受过儿科专科培训。共有51.7%的人参加过马蹄内翻足培训课程。超过一半(57.5%)的人指出在整个培训过程中马蹄内翻足治疗方法发生了变化。大多数人使用4至7个(88.7%)长腿石膏(98.4%),每隔7天更换一次(93.4%)。最常用的是石膏(69.4%)。最常见的支具是米切尔 - 庞塞蒂支具(72.9%)。平均84.8%的马蹄内翻足需要进行跟腱切断术。最常用的麻醉剂是麻醉凝胶(43.0%)。跟腱切断术大多发生在6个月以下的患者中(63.1%)。跟腱切断术的地点分别是手术室(46.5%)、诊所(45.4%)和治疗室(8.1%)。石膏拆除主要用锯子进行(54.7%)。观察到的石膏烫伤的平均发生率为5.5%。大多数提供者不使用预防石膏烫伤的装置(76.6%)。报告的石膏相关并发症包括移位(85.9%)、皮肤刺激(75.8%)和锯子相关损伤(35.9%)。在矫形器、跟腱切断术的指征和操作以及石膏材料方面存在马蹄内翻足治疗差异。石膏固定并发症仍然是一个问题。有必要进行进一步研究以确定某些治疗方法是否会使患者易患特定并发症。