Suppr超能文献

不同种族群体中用于高血压诊断和管理的血压测量:一刀切。

Measurement of blood pressure for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in different ethnic groups: one size fits all.

作者信息

Gill Paramjit, Haque M Sayeed, Martin Una, Mant Jonathan, Mohammed Mohammed A, Heer Gurdip, Johal Amanpreet, Kaur Ramandeep, Schwartz Claire, Wood Sally, Greenfield Sheila M, McManus Richard J

机构信息

Primary Care Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0491-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and prevalence varies by ethnic group. The diagnosis and management of blood pressure are informed by guidelines largely based on data from white populations. This study addressed whether accuracy of blood pressure measurement in terms of diagnosis of hypertension varies by ethnicity by comparing two measurement modalities (clinic blood pressure and home monitoring) with a reference standard of ambulatory BP monitoring in three ethnic groups.

METHODS

Cross-sectional population study (June 2010 - December 2012) with patients (40-75 years) of white British, South Asian and African Caribbean background with and without a previous diagnosis of hypertension recruited from 28 primary care practices. The study compared the test performance of clinic BP (using various protocols) and home-monitoring (1 week) with a reference standard of mean daytime ambulatory measurements using a threshold of 140/90 mmHg for clinic and 135/85 mmHg for out of office measurement.

RESULTS

A total of 551 participants had complete data of whom 246 were white British, 147 South Asian and 158 African Caribbean. No consistent difference in accuracy of methods of blood pressure measurement was observed between ethnic groups with or without a prior diagnosis of hypertension: for people without hypertension, clinic measurement using three different methodologies had high specificity (75-97%) but variable sensitivity (33-65%) whereas home monitoring had sensitivity of 68-88% and specificity of 64-80%. For people with hypertension, detection of a raised blood pressure using clinic measurements had sensitivities of 34-69% with specificity of 73-92% and home monitoring had sensitivity (81-88%) and specificity (55-65%).

CONCLUSIONS

For people without hypertension, ABPM remains the choice for diagnosing hypertension compared to the other modes of BP measurement regardless of ethnicity. Differences in accuracy of home monitoring and clinic monitoring (higher sensitivity of the former; higher specificity of the latter) were also not affected by ethnicity.

摘要

背景

高血压是心血管疾病的主要危险因素,其患病率因种族而异。血压的诊断和管理主要依据基于白人人群数据的指南。本研究通过比较三种种族人群的两种血压测量方式(诊室血压和家庭血压监测)与动态血压监测这一参考标准,探讨了高血压诊断方面血压测量的准确性是否因种族而异。

方法

一项横断面人群研究(2010年6月 - 2012年12月),从28家基层医疗诊所招募了有或无高血压既往诊断史的40 - 75岁的英国白人、南亚人和非洲加勒比裔患者。该研究将诊室血压(采用多种方案)和家庭血压监测(1周)的检测性能与白天平均动态血压测量这一参考标准进行比较,诊室血压的诊断阈值为140/90 mmHg,非诊室测量的诊断阈值为135/85 mmHg。

结果

共有551名参与者拥有完整数据,其中246名是英国白人,147名是南亚人,158名是非洲加勒比裔。在有或无高血压既往诊断史的种族人群中,未观察到血压测量方法准确性的一致差异:对于无高血压的人群,使用三种不同方法进行的诊室测量具有较高的特异性(75 - 97%)但灵敏度各异(33 - 65%),而家庭血压监测的灵敏度为68 - 88%,特异性为64 - 80%。对于有高血压的人群,使用诊室测量检测血压升高的灵敏度为34 - 69%,特异性为73 - 92%,家庭血压监测的灵敏度为81 - 88%,特异性为55 - 65%。

结论

对于无高血压的人群,与其他血压测量方式相比,无论种族如何,动态血压监测仍是诊断高血压的首选。家庭血压监测和诊室血压监测在准确性上的差异(前者灵敏度更高;后者特异性更高)也不受种族影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/881a/5299651/955eddcd2a1e/12872_2017_491_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验