• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的比较:一项Meta分析及序贯试验分析的系统评价

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

作者信息

Jakobsen Janus Christian, Katakam Kiran Kumar, Schou Anne, Hellmuth Signe Gade, Stallknecht Sandra Elkjær, Leth-Møller Katja, Iversen Maria, Banke Marianne Bjørnø, Petersen Iggiannguaq Juhl, Klingenberg Sarah Louise, Krogh Jesper, Ebert Sebastian Elgaard, Timm Anne, Lindschou Jane, Gluud Christian

机构信息

The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812 Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, Rigshospitalet, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2
PMID:28178949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5299662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evidence on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for major depressive disorder is unclear.

METHODS

Our objective was to conduct a systematic review assessing the effects of SSRIs versus placebo, 'active' placebo, or no intervention in adult participants with major depressive disorder. We searched for eligible randomised clinical trials in The Cochrane Library's CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, PsycLIT, PsycINFO, Science Citation Index Expanded, clinical trial registers of Europe and USA, websites of pharmaceutical companies, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency until January 2016. All data were extracted by at least two independent investigators. We used Cochrane systematic review methodology, Trial Sequential Analysis, and calculation of Bayes factor. An eight-step procedure was followed to assess if thresholds for statistical and clinical significance were crossed. Primary outcomes were reduction of depressive symptoms, remission, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were suicides, suicide attempts, suicide ideation, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 131 randomised placebo-controlled trials enrolling a total of 27,422 participants were included. None of the trials used 'active' placebo or no intervention as control intervention. All trials had high risk of bias. SSRIs significantly reduced the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at end of treatment (mean difference -1.94 HDRS points; 95% CI -2.50 to -1.37; P < 0.00001; 49 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI -2.70 to -1.18); Bayes factor below predefined threshold (2.01*10). The effect estimate, however, was below our predefined threshold for clinical significance of 3 HDRS points. SSRIs significantly decreased the risk of no remission (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91; P < 0.00001; 34 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis adjusted CI 0.83 to 0.92); Bayes factor (1426.81) did not confirm the effect). SSRIs significantly increased the risks of serious adverse events (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.75; P = 0.009; 44 trials; Trial Sequential Analysis-adjusted CI 1.03 to 1.89). This corresponds to 31/1000 SSRI participants will experience a serious adverse event compared with 22/1000 control participants. SSRIs also significantly increased the number of non-serious adverse events. There were almost no data on suicidal behaviour, quality of life, and long-term effects.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRIs might have statistically significant effects on depressive symptoms, but all trials were at high risk of bias and the clinical significance seems questionable. SSRIs significantly increase the risk of both serious and non-serious adverse events. The potential small beneficial effects seem to be outweighed by harmful effects.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42013004420.

摘要

背景

关于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)用于治疗重度抑郁症的证据尚不明确。

方法

我们的目标是进行一项系统评价,评估SSRI与安慰剂、“活性”安慰剂或不进行干预相比,对成年重度抑郁症患者的疗效。我们检索了Cochrane图书馆的CENTRAL、PubMed、EMBASE、PsycLIT、PsycINFO、科学引文索引扩展版、欧洲和美国的临床试验注册库、制药公司网站、美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)以及欧洲药品管理局,检索截至2016年1月的符合条件的随机临床试验。所有数据由至少两名独立研究人员提取。我们采用Cochrane系统评价方法、序贯试验分析和贝叶斯因子计算。遵循八步程序来评估是否超过了统计和临床显著性阈值。主要结局为抑郁症状减轻、缓解和不良事件。次要结局为自杀、自杀未遂、自杀意念和生活质量。

结果

共纳入131项随机安慰剂对照试验,总计27422名参与者。没有试验使用“活性”安慰剂或不进行干预作为对照干预。所有试验均有较高的偏倚风险。SSRI在治疗结束时显著降低了汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)评分(平均差值-1.94个HDRS评分点;95%置信区间-2.50至-1.37;P<0.00001;49项试验;序贯试验分析调整后的置信区间-2.70至-1.18);贝叶斯因子低于预定义阈值(2.01×10)。然而,效应估计值低于我们预定义的临床显著性阈值3个HDRS评分点。SSRI显著降低了未缓解的风险(风险比0.88;95%置信区间0.84至0.91;P<0.00001;34项试验;序贯试验分析调整后的置信区间0.83至0.92);贝叶斯因子(1426.81)未证实该效应。SSRI显著增加了严重不良事件的风险(比值比1.37;95%置信区间1.08至1.75;P = 0.009;44项试验;序贯试验分析调整后的置信区间1.03至1.89)。这意味着每1000名服用SSRI的参与者中有31人会经历严重不良事件,而每1000名对照参与者中有22人会经历。SSRI还显著增加了非严重不良事件的数量。关于自杀行为、生活质量和长期影响的数据几乎没有。

结论

SSRI可能在统计学上对抑郁症状有显著影响,但所有试验均有较高的偏倚风险,其临床显著性似乎存疑。SSRI显著增加了严重和非严重不良事件的风险。潜在的微小有益作用似乎被有害作用所抵消。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42013004420。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/51824ebafb61/12888_2016_1173_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/98c2a5527c1a/12888_2016_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/9e1c3b206270/12888_2016_1173_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/2312f9ab3bde/12888_2016_1173_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/63ccdb7cd057/12888_2016_1173_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/ae6a7edec968/12888_2016_1173_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/19d39848df57/12888_2016_1173_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/7ec5060222a3/12888_2016_1173_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/5058e5a7eee3/12888_2016_1173_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/7db94b0848d4/12888_2016_1173_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/ef6f70f15e08/12888_2016_1173_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/07d2b86ffb62/12888_2016_1173_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/51824ebafb61/12888_2016_1173_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/98c2a5527c1a/12888_2016_1173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/9e1c3b206270/12888_2016_1173_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/2312f9ab3bde/12888_2016_1173_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/63ccdb7cd057/12888_2016_1173_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/ae6a7edec968/12888_2016_1173_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/19d39848df57/12888_2016_1173_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/7ec5060222a3/12888_2016_1173_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/5058e5a7eee3/12888_2016_1173_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/7db94b0848d4/12888_2016_1173_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/ef6f70f15e08/12888_2016_1173_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/07d2b86ffb62/12888_2016_1173_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/5299662/51824ebafb61/12888_2016_1173_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的比较:一项Meta分析及序贯试验分析的系统评价
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1173-2.
2
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 18;9(9):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub3.
3
Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C.用于慢性丙型肝炎的直接作用抗病毒药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD012143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012143.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的新一代抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3.
7
Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.住院有营养风险的成年人的营养支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 19;5(5):CD011598. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011598.pub2.
8
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
9
Antidepressants for depression in adults with HIV infection.用于感染HIV的成年抑郁症患者的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD008525. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008525.pub3.
10
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid and long-lasting antidepressant-like effects of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptor antagonist PA-915 in chronic stress mouse models.垂体腺苷酸环化酶激活多肽受体拮抗剂PA - 915在慢性应激小鼠模型中具有快速且持久的抗抑郁样作用。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03209-4.
2
Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17,938 ameliorates LPS-induced depression-like and anxiety-like behaviors by modulating gut microbiota and brain metabolic function.罗伊氏乳杆菌DSM 17938通过调节肠道微生物群和脑代谢功能改善脂多糖诱导的抑郁样和焦虑样行为。
Gut Pathog. 2025 Aug 21;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13099-025-00739-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Placebo response rates in antidepressant trials: a systematic review of published and unpublished double-blind randomised controlled studies.抗抑郁试验中的安慰剂反应率:已发表和未发表的双盲随机对照研究的系统评价
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;3(11):1059-1066. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30307-8. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
2
Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them.循证临床实践:证据有效性的威胁概述及如何将其降至最低
Eur J Intern Med. 2016 Jul;32:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 May 6.
3
The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.
Protocol to develop and pilot a primary mental healthcare intervention model to address the medium- to long-term Ebola associated psychological distress and psychosocial problems in Mubende District in Central Uganda (the Ebola+D project).
制定并试行一项初级精神卫生保健干预模型的方案,以应对乌干达中部穆本德区埃博拉疫情中长期相关的心理困扰和社会心理问题(埃博拉+D项目)。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329591. eCollection 2025.
4
Discovery of Herbal Remedies and Key Components for Major Depressive Disorder Through Biased Random Walk Analysis on a Multiscale Network.通过多尺度网络上的有偏随机游走分析发现治疗重度抑郁症的草药疗法和关键成分
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 28;26(5):2162. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052162.
5
Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy in depression - complementarity or exclusion?抑郁症的药物治疗与心理治疗——互补还是排斥?
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2024 Dec;33(4):257-266. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2024.147104. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
6
Beneficial and harmful effects of duloxetine versus placebo, 'active placebo' or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.度洛西汀与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或不干预对成人重度抑郁症的有益和有害影响:一项随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e082853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082853.
7
Preoperative antidepressant use in patients with depression is associated with increased complications and additional shoulder procedures following rotator cuff repair.抑郁症患者术前使用抗抑郁药与肩袖修复术后并发症增加及额外的肩部手术相关。
JSES Int. 2024 Sep 1;9(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.198. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
The Etiopathogenic Mosaic of Suicidal Behaviour.自杀行为的病因学拼图
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jan 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.3390/bs15010087.
9
Expectancy-Mood Neural Dynamics Predict Mechanisms of Short- and Long-Term Antidepressant Placebo Effects.预期-情绪神经动力学预测短期和长期抗抑郁安慰剂效应的机制。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Aug;10(8):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.002. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
10
Psychiatric Considerations of Infertility.不孕症的精神科考量
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Nov;21(11):1175-1182. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0239. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
PRISMA 扩展声明用于报告包含健康保健干预措施网络荟萃分析的系统评价:清单和说明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):777-84. doi: 10.7326/M14-2385.
4
Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant-placebo differences.基于经验得出的标准对抗抑郁药与安慰剂差异的临床意义提出了质疑。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:60-2. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 12.
5
DEPERROR: Risks of systematic errors in drug and non-drug randomized clinical trials assessing intervention effects in patients with unipolar depression.DEPERROR:评估单相抑郁症患者干预效果的药物和非药物随机临床试验中的系统误差风险。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 1;179:121-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.042. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
Rhodiola rosea versus sertraline for major depressive disorder: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.红景天与舍曲林治疗重度抑郁症的随机安慰剂对照试验。
Phytomedicine. 2015 Mar 15;22(3):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
7
A randomized trial of combined citalopram and naltrexone for nonabstinent outpatients with co-occurring alcohol dependence and major depression.西酞普兰与纳曲酮联合治疗伴有酒精依赖和重度抑郁的非戒酒门诊患者的随机试验。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Apr;35(2):143-9. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000287.
8
Efficacy and safety of vilazodone 20 and 40 mg in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.伏硫西汀20毫克和40毫克治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Mar;30(2):67-74. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000057.
9
Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods.采用Meta分析方法的系统评价中统计学意义和临床意义的阈值
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 21;14:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-120.
10
Addition of an NK1 receptor antagonist to an SSRI did not enhance the antidepressant effects of SSRI monotherapy: results from a randomized clinical trial in patients with major depressive disorder.在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)基础上加用NK1受体拮抗剂并不能增强SSRI单药治疗的抗抑郁效果:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的随机临床试验结果
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014 Nov;29(6):568-77. doi: 10.1002/hup.2444. Epub 2014 Oct 20.