Suppr超能文献

成人的管理式医疗与住院死亡率:主要支付方的影响

Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer.

作者信息

Hines Anika L, Raetzman Susan O, Barrett Marguerite L, Moy Ernest, Andrews Roxanne M

机构信息

Truven Health Analytics, 7700 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, 20814, MD, USA.

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb 8;17(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2062-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because managed care is increasingly prevalent in health care finance and delivery, it is important to ascertain its effects on health care quality relative to that of fee-for-service plans. Some stakeholders are concerned that basing gatekeeping, provider selection, and utilization management on cost may lower quality of care. To date, research on this topic has been inconclusive, largely because of variation in research methods and covariates. Patient age has been the only consistently evaluated outcome predictor. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for Medicare and privately insured patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design was used to examine the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for four common inpatient conditions. Data from the 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for 11 states were linked to data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database. Hospital discharges were categorized as managed care or fee for service. A phased approach to multivariate logistic modeling examined the likelihood of inpatient mortality when adjusting for individual patient and hospital characteristics and for county fixed effects.

RESULTS

Results showed different effects of managed care for Medicare and privately insured patients. Privately insured patients in managed care had an advantage over their fee-for-service counterparts in inpatient mortality for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure; no such advantage was found for the Medicare managed care population. To the extent that the study showed a protective effect of privately insured managed care, it was driven by individuals aged 65 years and older, who had consistently better outcomes than their non-managed care counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Privately insured patients in managed care plans, especially older adults, had better outcomes than those in fee-for-service plans. Patients in Medicare managed care had outcomes similar to those in Medicare FFS. Additional research is needed to understand the role of patient selection, hospital quality, and differences among county populations in the decreased odds of inpatient mortality among patients in private managed care and to determine why this result does not hold for Medicare.

摘要

背景

由于管理式医疗在医疗保健融资和服务中越来越普遍,确定其相对于按服务收费计划对医疗质量的影响很重要。一些利益相关者担心,基于成本进行守门人制度、提供者选择和利用管理可能会降低医疗质量。迄今为止,关于这一主题的研究尚无定论,主要是因为研究方法和协变量存在差异。患者年龄一直是唯一持续评估的结果预测因素。本研究全面评估了管理式医疗与医疗保险和私人保险患者住院死亡率之间的关联。

方法

采用横断面设计来研究管理式医疗与四种常见住院疾病的住院死亡率之间的关联。来自11个州的2009年医疗保健成本和利用项目州住院数据库的数据与美国医院协会年度调查数据库的数据相链接。医院出院病例分为管理式医疗或按服务收费。采用分阶段的多变量逻辑回归建模方法,在调整个体患者和医院特征以及县固定效应后,研究住院死亡率的可能性。

结果

结果显示管理式医疗对医疗保险和私人保险患者有不同影响。在急性心肌梗死、中风、肺炎和充血性心力衰竭的住院死亡率方面,参加管理式医疗的私人保险患者比按服务收费的同行有优势;医疗保险管理式医疗人群未发现此类优势。就该研究显示私人保险管理式医疗的保护作用而言,这是由65岁及以上的人群驱动的,他们的结果始终优于非管理式医疗的同行。

结论

参加管理式医疗计划的私人保险患者,尤其是老年人,比参加按服务收费计划的患者有更好的结果。医疗保险管理式医疗的患者结果与医疗保险按服务收费的患者相似。需要进一步研究以了解患者选择、医院质量以及县人群之间的差异在私人管理式医疗患者住院死亡率降低几率中的作用,并确定为何这一结果不适用于医疗保险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65f1/5299791/c4801952c3b8/12913_2017_2062_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验