Brown J, Watson E, Alberman E
Department of Economics, Queen Mary College.
Arch Dis Child. 1989 Oct;64(10):1488-95. doi: 10.1136/adc.64.10.1488.
A computerised child health register was used to study the coverage, referral rate, and false positive rate of the eight month hearing distraction test in a cohort of 1990 births to residents of one district during an eight month period. Coverage by the age of 9 months was under 60% and varied with ethnic group and immunisation record. The true problem rate among those referred was 48%. None of the three children in the cohort who had a sensorineural hearing loss was picked up by screening, although it did identify children with conductive loss. The findings question the value of the distraction test as currently used, and underline the usefulness of computerisation, even if limited to child registration, in the evaluation of screening tests.
利用计算机化的儿童健康登记系统,对某一地区居民在八个月期间出生的1990名婴儿队列进行了为期八个月的听力分散测试,以研究其覆盖率、转诊率和假阳性率。9个月龄时的覆盖率低于60%,且因种族和免疫记录而异。转诊儿童中的实际问题发生率为48%。该队列中有三名患有感音神经性听力损失的儿童均未通过筛查被发现,尽管筛查确实识别出了患有传导性听力损失的儿童。这些发现对目前使用的分散测试的价值提出了质疑,并强调了计算机化在评估筛查测试中的有用性,即使仅限于儿童登记。