Kennedy C R, Kimm L, Dees D C, Evans P I, Hunter M, Lenton S, Thornton R D
Department of Child Health, Southampton General Hospital.
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Oct;66(10 Spec No):1124-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.10_spec_no.1124.
The auditory function of 370 infants, drawn from both low and high risk groups, was tested before postnatal discharge using three tests: standard auditory brain stem responses (ABR), automated analysis of ABR, and automated analysis of evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE). All infants failing any neonatal test had further audiological evaluation. Follow up information was also available on those who passed neonatal tests. Automated OAE testing of both ears was quickest (median 12.5 minutes) and least invasive (no scalp electrodes). Bilateral failure rates (and upper 95% confidence limits) with a stimulus 35-36 dB above normal hearing threshold level (nHL) were 3.0% (4.6) with automated OAE, 3.2% (5.1) with ABR, and 2.7% (4.4) with automated ABR. Automated OAE was the test most sensitive for subsequently confirmed hearing impairment. Sequential testing with automated OAE followed, in those failing this test, by automated ABR would have provided a screening test for substantial hearing impairment with a specificity greater than 99% in this population. Possible application as a universal screen is discussed.
对370名来自低风险和高风险组的婴儿在出生后出院前进行了听力功能测试,使用了三项测试:标准听性脑干反应(ABR)、ABR自动分析和诱发耳声发射(OAE)自动分析。所有未通过任何新生儿测试的婴儿都接受了进一步的听力学评估。对于通过新生儿测试的婴儿,也有随访信息。双耳自动OAE测试最快(中位数为12.5分钟)且侵入性最小(无需头皮电极)。在高于正常听力阈值水平(nHL)35 - 36 dB的刺激下,自动OAE的双侧失败率(及95%置信上限)为3.0%(4.6),ABR为3.2%(5.1),自动ABR为2.7%(4.4)。自动OAE是对随后确诊的听力障碍最敏感的测试。对于未通过该测试的婴儿,先进行自动OAE测试,然后进行自动ABR的序贯测试,可为该人群中严重听力障碍提供一种特异性大于99%的筛查测试。文中还讨论了其作为通用筛查方法的可能应用。