Hosseinian Mohammad Ali, Loron Ali Gharibi, Soleimanifard Yalda
Department of General Surgery, Emam Hosein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences.
Department of General Surgery, Emam Hosein Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; Shahed University School of Medicine.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;50(1):36-40. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.1.36. Epub 2017 Feb 5.
Surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is necessary when non-surgical treatments fail. Complications of surgical procedures vary from short-term post-surgical pain to permanent disability. The outcome of TOS surgery is affected by the visibility during the operation. In this study, we have compared the complications arising during the supraclavicular and the transaxillary approaches to determine the appropriate approach for TOS surgery.
In this study, 448 patients with symptoms of TOS were assessed. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 1:4, and the mean age was 34.5 years. Overall, 102 operations were performed, including unilateral, bilateral, and reoperations, and the patients were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 102 patients, 63 underwent the supraclavicular approach, 32 underwent the transaxillary approach, and 7 underwent the transaxillary approach followed by the supraclavicular approach. Complications were evaluated over 24 months.
The prevalence of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and vessel injuries in the transaxillary and the supraclavicular approaches was equal. We found more permanent and transient brachial plexus injuries in the case of the transaxillary approach than in the case of the supraclavicular approach, but the difference was not statistically significant. Persistent pain and symptoms were significantly more common in patients who underwent the transaxillary approach (p<0.05).
The supraclavicular approach seems to be the more effective technique of the two because it offers the surgeon better access to the brachial plexus and a direct view. This approach for a TOS operation offers a better surgical outcome and lower reoperation rates than the transaxillary method. Our results showed the supraclavicular approach to be the preferred method for TOS operations.
当非手术治疗失败时,胸廓出口综合征(TOS)的手术治疗是必要的。手术并发症从术后短期疼痛到永久性残疾不等。TOS手术的结果受手术过程中视野的影响。在本研究中,我们比较了锁骨上入路和腋下入路手术期间出现的并发症,以确定TOS手术的合适入路。
在本研究中,对448例有TOS症状的患者进行了评估。男女比例约为1:4,平均年龄为34.5岁。总共进行了102例手术,包括单侧、双侧和再次手术,并对患者进行了回顾性评估。在这102例患者中,63例采用锁骨上入路,32例采用腋下入路,7例采用腋下入路后再行锁骨上入路。对24个月内的并发症进行了评估。
腋下入路和锁骨上入路气胸、血胸和血管损伤的发生率相同。我们发现腋下入路比锁骨上入路出现更多的永久性和暂时性臂丛神经损伤,但差异无统计学意义。采用腋下入路的患者持续疼痛和症状明显更常见(p<0.05)。
锁骨上入路似乎是两种入路中更有效的技术,因为它能为外科医生提供更好的臂丛神经显露和直视视野。这种TOS手术入路比腋下入路能提供更好的手术效果和更低的再次手术率。我们的结果表明锁骨上入路是TOS手术的首选方法。