Graduate Interdisciplinary Program in Entomology and Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 9;7:42448. doi: 10.1038/srep42448.
The ecological success of social insects is frequently ascribed to improvements in task performance due to division of labour amongst workers. While much research has focused on improvements associated with lifetime task specialization, members of colonies can specialize on a given task over shorter time periods. Eusocial bees in particular must collect pollen and nectar rewards to survive, but most workers appear to mix collection of both rewards over their lifetimes. We asked whether bumblebees specialize over timescales shorter than their lifetime. We also explored factors that govern such patterns, and asked whether reward specialists made more foraging bouts than generalists. In particular, we described antennal morphology and size of all foragers in a single colony and related these factors to each forager's complete foraging history, obtained using radio frequency identification (RFID). Only a small proportion of foragers were lifetime specialists; nevertheless, >50% of foragers specialized daily on a given reward. Contrary to expectations, daily and lifetime reward specialists were not better foragers (being neither larger nor making more bouts); larger bees with more antennal olfactory sensilla made more bouts, but were not more specialized. We discuss causes and functions of short and long-term patterns of specialization for bumblebee colonies.
社会昆虫的生态成功通常归因于工蜂之间分工带来的任务执行效率的提高。虽然大量研究集中在与终身任务专业化相关的改进上,但群体成员可以在较短的时间内专门从事某项任务。特别是群居蜜蜂必须收集花粉和花蜜作为生存奖励,但大多数工蜂似乎在其一生中混合收集这两种奖励。我们询问了大黄蜂是否会在比其生命周期更短的时间内专门从事某项任务。我们还探讨了支配这些模式的因素,并询问了奖励专家是否比通才进行了更多的觅食活动。特别是,我们描述了一个单一群体中所有觅食者的触角形态和大小,并使用射频识别 (RFID) 将这些因素与每个觅食者的完整觅食历史相关联。只有一小部分觅食者是终身专家;尽管如此,>50%的觅食者每天都会专门针对某种奖励。与预期相反,每日和终身奖励专家并不是更好的觅食者(既不大也不进行更多的活动);具有更多触角嗅觉感受器的较大蜜蜂进行的活动更多,但专业化程度较低。我们讨论了大黄蜂群体短期和长期专业化模式的原因和功能。