Lee Ryan K L, Griffith James F, Tang W K, Ng Alex W H, Yeung David K W
Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Br J Radiol. 2017 Apr;90(1072):20160932. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160932. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
To compare the effect of traction during non-arthrographic and arthrographic MR examination of the wrist with regard to joint space width, joint fluid dispersion and cartilage surface visibility.
Prospective 3-T MRI study of 100 wrists in 96 patients. The first 50 wrists underwent MR arthrography first without traction and then with traction. The following 50 wrists underwent standard MR first without traction and then with traction. On these examinations, two radiologists independently measured (i) joint space width, semi-quantitatively graded (ii) joint fluid dispersion between opposing cartilage surfaces and (iii) articular cartilage surface visibility. The three parameters were compared between the two groups.
Traction led to an increase in joint space width at nearly all joints in all patients (p < 0.05), although more so in the arthrography (∆ = 0.08-0.79 mm, all p < 0.05) than in the non-arthrography (∆ = 0.001-0.61 mm, all p < 0.05) group. Joint fluid dispersion and cartilage surface visibility improved after traction in nearly all joints (p < 0.05) in all patients and more so in the arthographic than in the non-arthrography group.
Traction did significantly improve cartilage surface visibility for standard MRI of the wrist although the effect was not as great as that seen with MR arthography or MR arthrography with traction. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study to show the beneficial effect of traction during standard non-arthrography MRI of the wrist and compare the effect of traction between non-arthrographic and arthrographic MRI of the wrist.
比较在腕关节非关节造影和关节造影磁共振成像(MRI)检查期间进行牵引对关节间隙宽度、关节液扩散及软骨表面可视性的影响。
对96例患者的100个腕关节进行前瞻性3T MRI研究。前50个腕关节先进行无牵引的关节造影MRI检查,然后进行有牵引的检查。接下来的50个腕关节先进行无牵引的标准MRI检查,然后进行有牵引的检查。在这些检查中,两名放射科医生独立测量:(i)关节间隙宽度,进行半定量分级;(ii)相对软骨表面之间的关节液扩散;(iii)关节软骨表面可视性。比较两组之间的这三个参数。
牵引使所有患者几乎所有关节的关节间隙宽度增加(p < 0.05),尽管关节造影组(Δ = 0.08 - 0.79 mm,所有p < 0.05)比非关节造影组(Δ = 0.001 - 0.61 mm,所有p < 0.05)增加得更多。几乎所有患者所有关节在牵引后关节液扩散和软骨表面可视性均得到改善(p < 0.05),且关节造影组比非关节造影组改善更明显。
对于腕关节标准MRI,牵引确实显著改善了软骨表面可视性,尽管效果不如关节造影MRI或牵引下关节造影MRI显著。知识进展:这是第一项显示在腕关节标准非关节造影MRI期间牵引有益效果并比较腕关节非关节造影和关节造影MRI牵引效果的研究。