• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析挪威 MATRICS 共识认知电池的因素。

Factor analyzing the Norwegian MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery.

机构信息

Research Department, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway.

Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;71(5):336-345. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12513. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/pcn.12513
PMID:28182301
Abstract

AIM

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) assesses seven cognitive domains with 10 subtests. This domain structure has not been demonstrated. Three factors have been produced in US samples. We examined the dimensional structure of the Norwegian MCCB. In addition, we studied the contribution of each subtest to the battery sum score.

METHODS

The participants were 131 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 300 healthy controls. Their Norwegian MCCB test scores were subject to exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and regression analysis.

RESULTS

The theoretical MCCB factor structure was not shown. In the patient group, three-factor and two-factor models had acceptable fit. In both groups, the Symbol Coding, Spatial Span, Letter-Number Span, and Visual Learning subtests contributed most to the sum score.

CONCLUSION

The theoretical domain structure of the MCCB could not be demonstrated in these Norwegian participants. Consonant with US studies, models with three and two factors had mediocre fit, and in the schizophrenia spectrum disorder group only. In both groups, the subtests Symbol Coding, Working Memory, and Learning were the most sensitive in tapping general neurocognitive performance, supporting US results. We conclude that in both Norway and the USA, the MCCB generates the same cognitive domains through factor analysis, but that these domains are not the ones suggested by the MATRICS project.

摘要

目的

MATRICS 共识认知电池 (MCCB) 用 10 个分量表评估 7 个认知域。该域结构尚未得到证实。在美国样本中产生了三个因素。我们检验了挪威 MCCB 的维度结构。此外,我们还研究了每个分量表对电池总分的贡献。

方法

参与者为 131 名精神分裂症谱系障碍患者和 300 名健康对照者。他们的挪威 MCCB 测试分数进行了探索性和验证性因素分析和回归分析。

结果

理论上的 MCCB 因子结构没有显示出来。在患者组中,三因素和两因素模型具有可接受的拟合度。在两组中,符号编码、空间广度、字母数字广度和视觉学习分量表对总分的贡献最大。

结论

在这些挪威参与者中,无法证明 MCCB 的理论域结构。与美国的研究一致,三因素和两因素模型的拟合度中等,且仅在精神分裂症谱系障碍组中。在两组中,符号编码、工作记忆和学习这三个分量表最能敏感地反映出一般的神经认知表现,支持美国的研究结果。我们的结论是,在挪威和美国,MCCB 通过因子分析产生相同的认知域,但这些域不是 MATRICS 项目所建议的域。

相似文献

1
Factor analyzing the Norwegian MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery.分析挪威 MATRICS 共识认知电池的因素。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 May;71(5):336-345. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12513. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
2
Factor structure of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) in schizophrenia.精神分裂症 MATRICS 共识认知电池(MCCB)的因子结构。
Schizophr Res. 2013 May;146(1-3):244-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.026. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
3
Latent structure of cognition in schizophrenia: a confirmatory factor analysis of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).精神分裂症认知的潜在结构:MATRICS共识认知成套测验(MCCB)的验证性因素分析
Psychol Med. 2015;45(12):2657-66. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000641. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
4
Familial aggregation of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery scores in a large sample of outpatients with schizophrenia and their unaffected relatives.精神分裂症门诊患者及其未受影响亲属大样本中 MATRICS 共识认知电池评分的家族聚集性。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jun;48(8):1359-1366. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002902. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
An empirical evaluation of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in bipolar disorder.双相障碍中 MATRICS 共识认知电池的实证评估。
Bipolar Disord. 2014 May;16(3):318-25. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12134. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Transdiagnostic validity of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery across the autism-schizophrenia spectrum.自闭症-精神分裂症谱系中 MATRICS 共识认知电池的跨诊断有效性。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1623-1632. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001582. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
Psychometric characteristics of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in a large pooled cohort of stable schizophrenia patients.在一个稳定精神分裂症患者的大型队列中,MATRICS 共识认知电池的心理计量学特征。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Dec;190:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
The Brazilian standardization of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery (MCCB): Psychometric study.MATRICS共识认知成套测验(MCCB)的巴西标准化:心理测量学研究。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Jul;185:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
9
A confirmatory factor analysis of the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery in severe mental illness.严重精神疾病中MATRICS共识认知成套测验的验证性因素分析
Schizophr Res. 2016 Aug;175(1-3):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.03.013. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB): performance and functional correlates.MATRICS 共识认知电池 (MCCB):表现与功能相关性。
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;220(3):1094-101. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.060. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery: An Update.MATRICS共识认知成套测验:最新情况
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2023;63:1-18. doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_395.
2
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery: Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version in Young Patients With Major Depression Disorder.MATRICS共识认知成套测验:中文版在青少年重度抑郁症患者中的心理测量特性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 28;12:745486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.745486. eCollection 2021.
3
The Factor Structure of Cognitive Functioning in Cognitively Healthy Participants: a Meta-Analysis and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data.
认知健康参与者认知功能的因素结构:荟萃分析和个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2020 Mar;30(1):51-96. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09423-6. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
4
Transdiagnostic validity of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery across the autism-schizophrenia spectrum.自闭症-精神分裂症谱系中 MATRICS 共识认知电池的跨诊断有效性。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jul;50(10):1623-1632. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001582. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
5
What is the optimal neuropsychological test battery for schizophrenia in China?在中国,精神分裂症的最佳神经心理学测试组合是什么?
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.01.034. Epub 2019 Feb 1.