Suppr超能文献

能力:对联络精神科服务中决策能力评估的一项审计

Capacity : an audit of decision-making capacity assessments in a liaison psychiatry service.

作者信息

Spencer Benjamin W J, Wilson Gareth, Okon-Rocha Ewa, Owen Gareth S, Wilson Jones Charlotte

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, Kent.

出版信息

BJPsych Bull. 2017 Feb;41(1):7-11. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.052613.

Abstract

We aimed to audit the documentation of decision-making capacity (DMC) assessments by our liaison psychiatry service against the legal criteria set out in the Mental Capacity Act 2005. We audited 3 months split over a 2-year period occurring before, during and after an educational intervention to staff. There were 21 assessments of DMC in month 1 (6.9% of all referrals), 27 (9.7%) in month 16, and 24 (6.6%) in month 21. Only during the intervention (month 16) did any meet our gold-standard ( = 2). Severity of consequences of the decision (odds ratio (OR) 24.4) and not agreeing to the intervention (OR = 21.8) were highly likely to result in lacking DMC. Our audit demonstrated that DMC assessments were infrequent and poorly documented, with no effect of our legally focused educational intervention demonstrated. Our findings of factors associated with the outcome of the assessment of DMC confirm the anecdotal beliefs in this area. Clinicians and service leads need to carefully consider how to make the legal model of DMC more meaningful to clinicians when striving to improve documentation of DMC assessments.

摘要

我们旨在对照2005年《精神能力法案》规定的法律标准,审核我们联络精神科服务部门对决策能力(DMC)评估的记录情况。我们审核了在对工作人员进行教育干预之前、期间和之后的2年时间里,分3个月进行的相关记录。第1个月有21次DMC评估(占所有转诊的6.9%),第16个月有27次(9.7%),第21个月有24次(6.6%)。只有在干预期间(第16个月)才有评估达到我们的黄金标准(=2)。决策后果的严重性(优势比(OR)为24.4)以及不同意干预(OR = 21.8)很可能导致缺乏DMC。我们的审核表明,DMC评估很少进行且记录不佳,并未显示我们以法律为重点的教育干预有任何效果。我们关于与DMC评估结果相关因素的研究结果证实了该领域的一些传闻观点。临床医生和服务负责人在努力改进DMC评估记录时,需要仔细考虑如何使DMC的法律模式对临床医生更有意义。

相似文献

1
Capacity : an audit of decision-making capacity assessments in a liaison psychiatry service.
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Feb;41(1):7-11. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.052613.
2
Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity in 97 Hospitalized Patients With Cancer: A Call for Standardization.
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2024 Sep-Oct;65(5):489-498. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 24.
3
Audit of an inpatient liaison psychiatry consultation service.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22(3):278-88. doi: 10.1108/09526860910953548.
5
Assessment of decision-making capacity: views and experiences of consultation psychiatrists.
Psychosomatics. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
7
Examining the approaches used to assess decision-making capacity in healthcare practice.
N Z Med J. 2024 Jul 5;137(1598):22-32. doi: 10.26635/6965.6474.
8
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Medical Decision-Making Capacity Assessment.
J Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;24(4):599-604. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0022. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
9
When psychiatry and bioethics disagree about patient decision making capacity (DMC).
J Med Ethics. 2006 Feb;32(2):90-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013136.
10
Mental capacity assessments among general hospital inpatients referred to a specialist liaison psychiatry service for older people.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Aug;21(4):729-37. doi: 10.1017/S104161020900917X. Epub 2009 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of a Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model at the Grey Nuns Community Hospital.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 29;19(3):1560. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031560.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验