Chan C Yw, Yong S Wl, Mhaisalkar A S, Sin G L, Poon S H, Tan S M
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;28(3):95-100.
To review the mental capacity assessment of in-patients referred to consultation-liaison psychiatrists and to compare the assessment first made by primary care physicians.
Medical records of in-patients who were referred to consultation-liaison psychiatrists for mental capacity assessment between May and October 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Assessment was first made by a primary care physician; complex cases were referred to a consultation-liaison psychiatrist. Audit of each case note was conducted independently by at least two of the authors.
Medical records of 37 female and 26 male in-patients aged 24 to 91 (mean, 68.2) years were audited. Only 33.3% of these patients had no psychiatric diagnosis. Overall, assessments by primary care physicians were suboptimal. Assessments by consultation-liaison psychiatrists were more detailed, with documentation of mental capacity (93.7%) and psychiatric diagnosis (88.9%). Nonetheless, patient wishes and beliefs were poorly documented (19.0%), as were whether the patient had a lasting power of attorney or a court-appointed deputy (6.3%) and whether the patient had made advance care planning (0%).
Overall, mental capacity assessment was inadequately performed by primary care physicians and consultation-liaison psychiatrists. More work needs to be done to engage, educate, and empower all stakeholders involved.
回顾转介至会诊联络精神科医生处的住院患者的精神能力评估情况,并比较初级保健医生最初进行的评估。
回顾性分析2015年5月至10月间转介至会诊联络精神科医生处进行精神能力评估的住院患者的病历。评估首先由初级保健医生进行;复杂病例转介至会诊联络精神科医生。至少两名作者独立对每份病例记录进行审核。
审核了37名女性和26名男性住院患者的病历,年龄在24至91岁(平均68.2岁)之间。这些患者中只有33.3%没有精神科诊断。总体而言,初级保健医生的评估并不理想。会诊联络精神科医生的评估更详细,记录了精神能力(93.7%)和精神科诊断(88.9%)。然而,患者的意愿和信念记录不佳(19.0%),患者是否有持久授权书或法院指定的代理人(6.3%)以及患者是否制定了预先护理计划(0%)的记录也同样不佳。
总体而言,初级保健医生和会诊联络精神科医生对精神能力的评估执行得并不充分。需要做更多工作来让所有相关利益者参与、接受教育并赋予其权力。