• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留面神经的小脑桥脑角脑膜瘤治疗方法的疗效和结果。

Efficacy and outcomes of facial nerve-sparing treatment approach to cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.

机构信息

Departments of1Neurological Surgery and.

2Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1231-1241. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161982. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

DOI:10.3171/2016.10.JNS161982
PMID:28186449
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Advanced microsurgical techniques contribute to reduced morbidity and improved surgical management of meningiomas arising within the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). However, the goal of surgery has evolved to preserve the quality of the patient's life, even if it means leaving residual tumor. Concurrently, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become an acceptable and effective treatment modality for newly diagnosed, recurrent, or progressive meningiomas of the CPA. The authors review their institutional experience with CPA meningiomas treated with GKRS, surgery, or a combination of surgery and GKRS. They specifically focus on rates of facial nerve preservation and characterize specific anatomical features of tumor location with respect to the internal auditory canal (IAC). METHODS Medical records of 76 patients with radiographic evidence or a postoperative diagnosis of CPA meningioma, treated by a single surgeon between 1992 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm in greatest dimension were treated with GKRS, while patients with tumors 2.5 cm or larger underwent facial nerve-sparing microsurgical resection where appropriate. Various patient, clinical, and tumor data were gathered. Anatomical features of the tumor origin as seen on preoperative imaging confirmed by intraoperative investigation were evaluated for prognostic significance. Facial nerve preservation rates were evaluated. RESULTS According to our treatment paradigm, 51 (67.1%) patients underwent microsurgical resection and 25 (32.9%) patients underwent GKRS. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 34 (66.7%) patients, and subtotal resection (STR) in 17 (33.3%) patients. Tumors recurred in 12 (23.5%) patients initially treated surgically, requiring additional surgery and/or GKRS. Facial nerve function was unchanged or improved in 68 (89.5%) patients. Worsening facial nerve function occurred in 8 (10.5%) patients, all of whom had undergone microsurgical resection. Upfront treatment with GKRS for CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm was associated with preservation of facial nerve function in all patients over a median follow-up of 46 months, regardless of IAC invasion and tumor origin. Anatomical origin was associated with extent of resection but did not correlate with postoperative facial nerve function. Tumor size, extent of resection, and the presence of an arachnoid plane separating the tumor and the contents of the IAC were associated with postoperative facial nerve outcomes. CONCLUSIONS CPA meningiomas remain challenging lesions to treat, given their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. GKRS is a safe and effective option for managing CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm without associated mass effect or acute neurological symptoms. Maximal safe resection with preservation of neurological function can be performed for tumors 2.5 cm or larger without significant risk of facial nerve dysfunction, and, when combined with GKRS for recurrence and/or progression, provides excellent disease control. Anatomical features of the tumor origin offer critical insights for optimizing facial nerve preservation in this cohort.

摘要

目的

先进的显微外科技术有助于降低发病率和改善桥小脑角(CPA)脑膜瘤的手术治疗。然而,手术的目标已经演变为保留患者的生活质量,即使这意味着留下残余肿瘤。同时,伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)已成为治疗新诊断、复发性或进展性 CPA 脑膜瘤的一种可接受且有效的治疗方式。作者回顾了他们机构使用 GKRS、手术或手术联合 GKRS 治疗 CPA 脑膜瘤的经验。他们特别关注面神经保留率,并描述肿瘤位置与内听道(IAC)的特定解剖特征。

方法

回顾性分析了 1992 年至 2016 年间,由同一位外科医生治疗的 76 例有影像学证据或术后诊断为 CPA 脑膜瘤的患者的病历。最大直径小于 2.5cm 的患者接受 GKRS 治疗,而肿瘤直径大于或等于 2.5cm 的患者则接受适当的面神经保留显微切除术。收集了各种患者、临床和肿瘤数据。评估术前影像学所见并经术中证实的肿瘤起源的解剖特征与预后的相关性。评估面神经保留率。

结果

根据我们的治疗方案,51 例(67.1%)患者接受了显微切除术,25 例(32.9%)患者接受了 GKRS。34 例(66.7%)患者达到了全切除(GTR),17 例(33.3%)患者达到了次全切除(STR)。12 例(23.5%)最初接受手术治疗的患者肿瘤复发,需要再次手术和/或 GKRS。68 例(89.5%)患者面神经功能无变化或改善。8 例(10.5%)患者面神经功能恶化,均行显微切除术。对于最大直径小于 2.5cm 的 CPA 脑膜瘤, upfront 采用 GKRS 治疗,所有患者面神经功能均得到保留,中位随访时间为 46 个月,与 IAC 侵犯和肿瘤起源无关。肿瘤起源与切除程度有关,但与术后面神经功能无关。肿瘤大小、切除程度以及蛛网膜平面是否存在,将肿瘤与 IAC 内容物分隔开来,这些因素与术后面神经结果相关。

结论

CPA 脑膜瘤仍然是具有挑战性的病变,因为它们靠近关键的神经血管结构。对于最大直径小于 2.5cm、无相关肿块效应或急性神经症状的 CPA 脑膜瘤,GKRS 是一种安全有效的治疗方法。对于直径为 2.5cm 或更大的肿瘤,可进行最大限度的安全切除并保留神经功能,且不会显著增加面神经功能障碍的风险,结合 GKRS 治疗复发和/或进展,可获得极好的疾病控制。肿瘤起源的解剖特征为优化面神经保护提供了关键的见解。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and outcomes of facial nerve-sparing treatment approach to cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.保留面神经的小脑桥脑角脑膜瘤治疗方法的疗效和结果。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;127(6):1231-1241. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161982. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
2
Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large skull base meningiomas.大型颅底脑膜瘤的伽玛刀放射外科治疗。
J Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;122(2):363-72. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14198. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
3
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sellar and parasellar meningiomas: a multicenter study.伽玛刀放射外科治疗鞍区和鞍旁脑膜瘤:一项多中心研究。
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1268-77. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.JNS13139. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Facial and cochlear nerve function after surgery of cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.桥小脑角脑膜瘤手术后的面神经和听神经功能
Neurosurgery. 2005 Jul;57(1):77-90; discussion 77-90. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000154699.29796.34.
5
Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial benign meningiomas: follow-up outcome in 130 patients.伽玛刀放射外科治疗颅内良性脑膜瘤:130 例患者的随访结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jun 1;46(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.3.FOCUS1956.
6
Hearing preservation after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.经伽玛刀放射外科治疗桥小脑角脑膜瘤后的听力保留。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 1;129(Suppl1):38-46. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.GKS181308.
7
Facial nerve outcome and extent of resection in cystic versus solid vestibular schwannomas in radiosurgery era.伽玛刀治疗时代囊性与实性前庭神经鞘瘤的面神经功能结果和切除程度。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Mar;44(3):E3. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.FOCUS17667.
8
Cerebellopontine angle meningiomas: postoperative outcomes in a modern cohort.桥小脑角脑膜瘤:现代队列的术后结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Dec;35(6):E10. doi: 10.3171/2013.10.FOCUS13367.
9
Analysis of the results of recurrent intracranial meningiomas treated with re-radiosurgery.复发性颅内脑膜瘤再行放射外科治疗的结果分析
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;153:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle with extension into the internal auditory canal.延伸至内耳道的桥小脑角脑膜瘤。
J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan;102(1):17-23. doi: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0017.

引用本文的文献

1
Anatomical Insights into Gamma Knife Radiosurgery: Exploring Efficacy Across Infratentorial and Supratentorial Meningiomas.伽玛刀放射外科手术的解剖学见解:探索幕下和幕上脑膜瘤的疗效
Cureus. 2025 May 10;17(5):e83841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83841. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Skull Base Meningiomas.颅底脑膜瘤。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1416:47-68. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29750-2_5.
3
Surgical outcomes of premeatal and retromeatal cerebellopontine angle meningioma in Vietnam: a single-center prospective cross-sectional study.
越南前肉膜和后肉膜小脑脑桥角脑膜瘤的手术结果:一项单中心前瞻性横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 7;85(5):1626-1632. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000553. eCollection 2023 May.
4
The Combined TL-RS Approach: Advantages and Disadvantages of Working 360 Degrees around the Sigmoid Sinus.联合颞下窝-乙状窦后入路:围绕乙状窦进行360度操作的优缺点
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022 Jun 6;84(3):288-295. doi: 10.1055/a-1793-7925. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery.2型神经纤维瘤病患者的颅底脑膜瘤:一项评估立体定向放射外科治疗的国际多中心研究
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Jan 19;83(Suppl 2):e173-e180. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722937. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Clinical Studies and Pre-clinical Animal Models on Facial Nerve Preservation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration Following Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery-A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives.桥小脑角肿瘤手术后面神经保留、重建和再生的临床研究及临床前动物模型——系统评价与未来展望
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jun 18;9:659413. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.659413. eCollection 2021.
7
Small Cerebellopontine Angle Meningioma-Surgical Experience of 162 Patients and Literature Review.小听神经瘤——162例患者的手术经验及文献综述
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 9;10:558548. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.558548. eCollection 2020.
8
Surgery for posterior fossa meningioma: elevated postoperative cranial nerve morbidity discards aggressive tumor resection policy.后颅窝脑膜瘤的手术治疗:术后颅神经高发病率否定了积极的肿瘤切除术策略。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Apr;44(2):953-959. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01275-6. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
9
Early-Career Surgical Practice for Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors in the Era of Radiosurgery.立体定向放射外科时代的桥小脑角肿瘤早期外科治疗实践
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2018 Jun;79(3):269-281. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606826. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base.脑膜瘤:颅底与非颅底
Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Mar;42(1):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-0976-7. Epub 2018 Apr 7.