Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁类药物用于慢性腰痛:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案

Gabapentinoids for chronic low back pain: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Shanthanna Harsha, Gilron Ian, Thabane Lehana, Devereaux Philip J, Bhandari Mohit, AlAmri Rizq, Rajarathinam Manikandan, Kamath Sriganesh

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, McMaster University, Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Anesthesiology and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 10;6(11):e013200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013200.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a common condition and causes significant pain, distress and disability across the world. It is multifactorial in aetiology and is challenging to manage. Although the underlying mechanism of pain is predominantly non-specific, many argue that there is a substantial neuropathic pain element. Neuropathic pain is more severe, with significant disability. Gabapentinoids, including gabapentin and pregabalin, have proven efficacy in some neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear evidence, a substantial population of patients with CLBP are treated with gabapentinoids.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to assess whether the use of gabapentinoids is effective and safe in the treatment of predominant CLBP, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCTs).

METHODOLOGY

We will search the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane for RCTs published in English language and have used gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP. Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by paired reviewers using structured electronic forms, piloted between pairs of reviewers. The review outcomes will be guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief as the primary outcome. We propose to carry out meta-analysis if there are three or more studies in a particular outcome domain, using a random effects model. Pooled outcomes will be reported as weighted mean differences or standardised mean differences and risk ratios with their corresponding 95% CIs, for continuous outcomes and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Rating of quality of evidence will be reported using GRADE summary of findings table.

DISCUSSION

The proposed systematic review will be able to provide valuable evidence to help decision-making in the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP. This will help advance patient care and potentially highlight limitations in existing evidence to direct future research.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Being a systematic review, this study would not necessitate ethical review and approval. We plan to report and publish our study findings in a high impact medical journal, with online access.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016034040.

摘要

引言

慢性下腰痛(CLBP)是一种常见病症,在全球范围内导致严重疼痛、痛苦和残疾。其病因是多因素的,治疗具有挑战性。尽管疼痛的潜在机制主要是非特异性的,但许多人认为存在大量神经性疼痛成分。神经性疼痛更为严重,会导致显著残疾。加巴喷丁类药物,包括加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林,已在某些神经性疼痛病症中证明有效。尽管没有明确证据,但大量CLBP患者接受了加巴喷丁类药物治疗。

目的

我们旨在通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估使用加巴喷丁类药物治疗主要类型的CLBP是否有效和安全。

方法

我们将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,查找以英文发表的、使用加巴喷丁类药物治疗CLBP的RCT。研究选择和数据提取将由配对的评审员使用结构化电子表格独立进行,在评审员对之间进行预试验。综述结果将以临床试验中的方法、测量和疼痛评估倡议指南为指导,以疼痛缓解作为主要结果。如果在特定结果领域有三项或更多研究,我们建议使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。汇总结果将分别以加权平均差或标准化平均差以及风险比及其相应的95%置信区间报告,用于连续结果和二分结果。将使用GRADE结果总结表报告证据质量评级。

讨论

拟议的系统评价将能够提供有价值的证据,以帮助在使用加巴喷丁类药物治疗CLBP时进行决策。这将有助于推进患者护理,并可能突出现有证据的局限性,以指导未来的研究。

伦理与传播

作为一项系统评价,本研究无需伦理审查和批准。我们计划在具有在线访问权限的高影响力医学杂志上报告并发表我们的研究结果。

试验注册号

CRD42016034040。

相似文献

4
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.加巴喷丁用于成人慢性神经性疼痛和纤维肌痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 27;2014(4):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub3.
9
Nortriptyline for neuropathic pain in adults.去甲替林用于治疗成人神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 8;1(1):CD011209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011209.pub2.
10
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.加巴喷丁用于治疗成人慢性神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 9;6(6):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验