Suppr超能文献

高位牵引磨牙矫治器和面弓颈带疗法的头影测量评估

A cephalometric evaluation of high-pull molar headgear and face-bow neck strap therapy.

作者信息

Brown P

出版信息

Am J Orthod. 1978 Dec;74(6):621-32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90002-7.

Abstract

The effects of two different extraoral appliances were evaluated over a 1-year period. Of the thirty-seven cases selected for study, twenty were treated with a face-bow neck strap and seventeen were treated with a high-pull molar headgear. Patients ranged in age from 10.10 to 16.6 years and averaged 13.4 years. The appliances exerted less than 600 Gm. of force per side and were worn for 12 to 16 hours per day. All cases were fully banded, and extraction and nonextraction treatment were included. An analysis of pretreatment data revealed a high degree of selection. Patients selected for high-pull treatment generally exhibited larger anterior face heights, steeper mandibular plane angles, and a greater amount of tooth eruption of the upper first molars than the patients selected for neck strap therapy. A control group of ten untreated subjects was matched to each treatment group to permit assessment of the impact of treatment on growth. Relative to normal growth, treatment with face-bow neck strap traction tended to direct the maxilla and mandible downward and backward. The palatal plane was lowered anteriorly and point A was retracted. The maxillary molars were extruded, and concomitantly an increase in anterior face height and mandibular plane angle was observed. On the other hand, the high-pull molar headgear traction resulted only in increased mandibular molar eruption. However, there was also a nonsignificant tendency for point A to be held back and for lower anterior face height to increase. The comparison of the two treatment samples revealed that the functional occlusal plane was tipped down at the back as the maxillary molars were more extruded in the neck strap sample. In the high-pull sample, the functional occlusal plane was unchanged and the mandibular molars were more extruded than they were in the neck strap group.

摘要

在1年的时间里评估了两种不同口外矫治器的效果。在所选的37例研究病例中,20例采用面弓颈带治疗,17例采用高位牵引磨牙矫治器治疗。患者年龄在10.10至16.6岁之间,平均年龄为13.4岁。矫治器每侧施加的力小于600克,每天佩戴12至16小时。所有病例均全口带环,包括拔牙和不拔牙治疗。对治疗前数据的分析显示存在高度选择性。与选择颈带治疗的患者相比,选择高位牵引治疗的患者通常表现出更大的前牙面高度、更陡的下颌平面角以及上颌第一磨牙更大的萌出量。为每个治疗组匹配了10名未治疗的受试者作为对照组,以评估治疗对生长的影响。相对于正常生长,面弓颈带牵引治疗倾向于使上颌骨和下颌骨向下向后移动。腭平面在前方降低,A点后移。上颌磨牙被压低,同时观察到前牙面高度和下颌平面角增加。另一方面,高位牵引磨牙矫治器牵引仅导致下颌磨牙萌出增加。然而,A点也有不显著的后移趋势,前牙面下部高度增加。两个治疗样本的比较显示,由于在颈带样本中上颌磨牙被压低更多,功能性咬合平面在后部向下倾斜。在高位牵引样本中,功能性咬合平面未改变,下颌磨牙比颈带组被压低更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验