Leschinger Tim, Wallraff Christopher, Müller Dirk, Hackenbroch Matthias, Bovenschulte Henning, Siewe Jan
Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 24, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Cologne Center for Musculoskeletal Biomechanics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1919-7. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Understanding the mechanisms of shoulder impingement created by clinical tests is crucial to accurately evaluate the condition. The objective of this study was to relate mechanisms of subacromial and coracoid impingement occurring in positions of the shoulder during clinical examination, in quantitative and qualitative terms.
A 1.0T open magnetic resonance imaging system was used in 18 female and 19 male subjects, to determine the distances between the humeral head and the acromion or coracoid, and contact with the rotator cuff (RC). Measurements were taken with the shoulder in neutral, "Hawkins", "Neer", and 90° abduction/15° internal rotation (horizontal impingement test) positions. Additionally, impingement was classified based on the grade of RC contact with the acromion or coracoid.
In the Hawkins position, distance between the supraspinatus and the coracoid was closest (14.5 ± 4.5 mm), while the coracohumeral distance (CHD) narrowed (p < 0.001). In the horizontal impingement test position, the minimum distance between the subscapularis and coracoid was found, whereas the CHD increased (27.4 ± 5.7 mm). In the Neer and Hawkins positions, the space between the greater tuberosity and acromion was significantly narrowed, which was also the case in the horizontal impingement test position compared to neutral position (p < 0.001).
Shoulder movements of forward flexion and internal rotation (Hawkins test) and abduction and internal rotation (horizontal impingement test) can lead to different coracoid impingement mechanisms during clinical examination. The Hawkins, Neer, and horizontal impingement tests lead to comparable narrowed acromiohumeral distances and subacromial contact of the RC.
Therapeutic level III.
了解临床检查所造成的肩部撞击机制对于准确评估病情至关重要。本研究的目的是以定量和定性的方式,关联临床检查期间肩部处于不同位置时肩峰下和喙突撞击的机制。
对18名女性和19名男性受试者使用1.0T开放式磁共振成像系统,以确定肱骨头与肩峰或喙突之间的距离,以及与肩袖(RC)的接触情况。在肩部处于中立位、“霍金斯”位、“尼尔”位以及90°外展/15°内旋(水平撞击试验)位时进行测量。此外,根据RC与肩峰或喙突的接触程度对撞击进行分类。
在霍金斯位,冈上肌与喙突之间的距离最接近(14.5±4.5毫米),而肱喙距离(CHD)变窄(p<0.001)。在水平撞击试验位,发现肩胛下肌与喙突之间的距离最小,而CHD增加(27.4±5.7毫米)。在尼尔位和霍金斯位,大结节与肩峰之间的间隙明显变窄,与中立位相比,水平撞击试验位也是如此(p<0.001)。
前屈和内旋(霍金斯试验)以及外展和内旋(水平撞击试验)的肩部运动在临床检查期间可导致不同的喙突撞击机制。霍金斯试验、尼尔试验和水平撞击试验会导致类似的肩峰肱距离变窄以及RC的肩峰下接触。
治疗性III级。