Dittadi Ruggero, Rizzardi Sara, Masotti Silvia, Prontera Concetta, Ripoli Andrea, Fortunato Antonio, Alfano Antonio, Carrozza Cinzia, Correale Mario, Gessoni Gianluca, Migliardi Marco, Zucchelli Giancarlo, Clerico Aldo
U.O.C. Laboratorio Analisi, Laboratory Medicine Dept., Ospedale dell'Angelo, ULSS 12 Veneziana, Mestre, Venezia, Italy.
U.O. Laboratorio Analisi, Laboratory Medicine Dept., Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale di Cremona, Cremona, Italy.
Clin Chim Acta. 2017 May;468:105-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Recently, Beckman Coulter Diagnostics set up a new TSH immunoassay for the automated DxI platform. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the analytical performance and clinical results of this method with those of previous method.
A multicenter study (named TSH ELAS Study) was organized using 593 serum samples, collected from healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disorders, and 13 control samples, circulated in an External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme.
The values of LoB and LoD, and LoQ at 20% CV were 0.0004mIU/L, 0.001mIU/L and 0.0023mIU/L, respectively. Moreover, TSH concentrations >0.01mIU/L actually show imprecision values lower than 5% CV. This new TSH assay showed a systematic underestimation (on average of 6.25%) compared to old method, which is mainly due to larger differences between methods for samples with low TSH concentrations, related to the better analytical sensitivity of new compared to old method. In a reference population, including 279 apparently healthy adult subjects, Caucasian volunteers (mean age 43.6years, age 20-63years, 138 women and 141 males) the distribution of TSH concentrations was: mean (CI 95%) 1.694mIU/L (1.588-1.779), median 1.495mIU/L (1.412-1.588mIU/L), 97.5th percentile 3.707mIU/L.
The new TSH immunoassay for DxI platform shows some relevant improvements compared to the previous one: use of the most recent WHO 3rd IRP 81/563 standard and monoclonal antibodies (instead of polyclonal antibodies of the old method), and better analytical sensitivities and reproducibility.
最近,贝克曼库尔特诊断公司为自动化DxI平台设立了一种新的促甲状腺激素免疫测定法。本研究的目的是评估并比较该方法与之前方法的分析性能及临床结果。
组织了一项多中心研究(名为促甲状腺激素ELAS研究),使用了593份血清样本,这些样本采集自健康受试者和甲状腺疾病患者,以及13份在外部质量评估(EQA)计划中流通的对照样本。
检测限(LoB)、检测下限(LoD)以及变异系数(CV)为20%时的定量下限(LoQ)分别为0.0004mIU/L、0.001mIU/L和0.0023mIU/L。此外,促甲状腺激素浓度>0.01mIU/L时,实际显示的不精密度值低于5%CV。与旧方法相比,这种新的促甲状腺激素测定法显示出系统性低估(平均为6.25%),这主要是由于促甲状腺激素浓度较低的样本在两种方法之间存在较大差异,这与新方法相比旧方法具有更好的分析灵敏度有关。在一个包括279名明显健康的成年受试者的参考人群中,白种人志愿者(平均年龄43.6岁,年龄范围20 - 63岁,138名女性和141名男性)促甲状腺激素浓度分布为:均值(95%置信区间)1.694mIU/L(1.588 - 1.779),中位数1.495mIU/L(1.412 - 1.588mIU/L),第97.5百分位数3.707mIU/L。
与之前的方法相比,用于DxI平台的新促甲状腺激素免疫测定法有一些显著改进:采用了最新的世界卫生组织第三国际参考制剂81/563标准和单克隆抗体(而非旧方法中的多克隆抗体),并且具有更好的分析灵敏度和重现性。