Yao Jianfeng, Zhang Guixin, Liang Chen, Li Gang, Chen Xin, Ma Qiaoling, Zhai Weihua, Yang Donglin, He Yi, Jiang Erlie, Feng Sizhou, Han Mingzhe
Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China.
Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China.
Leuk Res. 2017 Apr;55:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto- and allo-SCT) are treatment choice for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after complete remission (CR). However, the decision-making remains controversial in some situations. To figure out the treatment choice, we retrospectively investigated 172 consecutive patients with primary AML who received auto- (n=46) or allo-SCT (n=126) from a single transplant center. Auto- and allo-SCT group demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.616, P=0.559, respectively). Cytogenetic classification and minimal residual disease (MRD) after one course of consolidation were identified as independent risk factors for DFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.800; 95% CI, 1.172-2.763; P=0.007; HR, 2.042; 95%CI, 1.003-4.154; P=0.049; respectively). We subsequently found that auto- and allo-SCT offered comparable DFS to patients with favorable or intermediate risk and were tested MRD after one course of consolidation (P=0.270) otherwise auto-SCT were inferior due to increased risk of leukemia relapse. Our study indicated that the combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD monitoring correlated with outcome of auto- versus allo-SCT and might help the choice between the two types of SCT for adults with primary AML, which is of significance for patients with expected intermediate prognosis in the current scenario.
自体和异基因干细胞移植(auto-和allo-SCT)都是急性髓系白血病(AML)成人患者完全缓解(CR)后的治疗选择。然而,在某些情况下,决策仍存在争议。为了明确治疗选择,我们回顾性研究了172例连续的原发性AML患者,这些患者来自单一移植中心,接受了自体(n = 46)或异基因干细胞移植(n = 126)。自体和异基因干细胞移植组的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)相当(分别为P = 0.616,P = 0.559)。细胞遗传学分类和一个巩固疗程后的微小残留病(MRD)被确定为DFS的独立危险因素(风险比(HR),1.800;95%置信区间,1.172 - 2.763;P = 0.007;HR,2.042;95%置信区间,1.003 - 4.154;P = 0.049)。随后我们发现,自体和异基因干细胞移植为具有良好或中等风险且在一个巩固疗程后检测MRD的患者提供了相当的DFS(P = 0.270),否则自体干细胞移植因白血病复发风险增加而较差。我们的研究表明,细胞遗传学分类和MRD监测的结合与自体和异基因干细胞移植的结果相关,可能有助于为原发性AML成人患者在两种类型的干细胞移植之间做出选择,这对于当前情况下预期预后中等的患者具有重要意义。