• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于决策支持的放射学医嘱录入系统中低适宜性评分检查趋势分析

Analysis of Low Appropriateness Score Exam Trends in Decision Support-based Radiology Order Entry System.

作者信息

Gupta Supriya, Klein Kandace, Singh Anand H, Thrall James H

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.

Department of Radiology and Imaging, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5):615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.12.011
PMID:28190702
Abstract

PURPOSE

Awareness of imaging utilization increased after implementation of Radiology Order Entry with decision support systems (ROE-DS). Our hypothesis is few exams with low Clinical Appropriateness Score (CAS) on ROE-DS are performed. Clinical indications of exams with CAS less than 3 (9-point scale) were re-reviewed and reports analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Structured Query Language-based query retrieved exams with CAS less than 3 in ROE-DS from January 2007 to December 2011. Reasons provided by physicians for ordering these exams and reports of exams performed were analyzed. For each indication, number of exams ordered and performed was calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using Student's t test and χ analysis (P < .05).

RESULTS

From 445,984 exams, 12,615 exams (2.8%) had CAS less than 3, and 7,956 exams (63%) were performed. Reasons for ordering of 12,615 low CAS exams were as follows: Requests by physician specialists without further explanation (4,516 = 35.8%), notation of special clinical circumstances (2,877 = 22.8%), requests by nonphysician staff without further explanation (1,383 = 10.9%), absence of suspected finding on previous modality (1,099 = 8.7%), patient preference (737 = 5.8%), and requests based on radiologists' recommendations (706 = 5.6%). Difference between male and female (male < female) preferences for low CAS exams was statistically significant (P < .01). Imaging outcome was highest for extremity MRI cases (66.7%; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Less than 3% of exams ordered had low CAS and about two-thirds of these were performed. Most common indication for ordering these exams was physician specialist request based on opinion of medical necessity without specification. Extremity MRI constituted the highest positive findings for low CAS exams performed.

摘要

目的

在实施带有决策支持系统的放射学医嘱录入(ROE-DS)后,对影像检查利用的认知有所提高。我们的假设是,ROE-DS上临床适宜性评分(CAS)较低的检查很少被执行。对CAS小于3(9分制)的检查的临床指征进行了重新审查并分析了报告。

材料与方法

基于结构化查询语言的查询检索了2007年1月至2011年12月ROE-DS中CAS小于3的检查。分析了医生开具这些检查的原因以及所执行检查的报告。对于每个指征,计算了开具和执行的检查数量。使用学生t检验和χ分析评估统计学显著性(P <.05)。

结果

在445,984项检查中,12,615项检查(2.8%)的CAS小于3,其中7,956项检查(63%)被执行。开具12,615项低CAS检查的原因如下:医生专家无进一步解释的请求(4,516 = 35.8%)、特殊临床情况的记录(2,877 = 22.8%)、非医生工作人员无进一步解释的请求(1,383 = 10.9%)、先前检查未发现可疑结果(1,099 = 8.7%)、患者偏好(737 = 5.8%)以及基于放射科医生建议的请求(706 = 5.6%)。男性和女性对低CAS检查的偏好差异(男性<女性)具有统计学显著性(P <.01)。四肢MRI检查的成像结果最高(66.7%;P <.01)。

结论

开具的检查中不到3%的检查CAS较低,其中约三分之二被执行。开具这些检查最常见的指征是医生专家基于医疗必要性意见提出的请求,但未详细说明。四肢MRI是执行的低CAS检查中阳性结果最高的。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Low Appropriateness Score Exam Trends in Decision Support-based Radiology Order Entry System.基于决策支持的放射学医嘱录入系统中低适宜性评分检查趋势分析
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5):615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.12.011. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
2
An electronic safety screening process during inpatient computerized physician order entry improves the efficiency of magnetic resonance imaging exams.电子安全筛查流程可提高住院患者计算机化医嘱录入时磁共振成像检查的效率。
Acad Radiol. 2013 Dec;20(12):1592-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.006.
3
Evaluating the Effect of Unstructured Clinical Information on Clinical Decision Support Appropriateness Ratings.评估非结构化临床信息对临床决策支持适宜性评级的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jun;14(6):737-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Radiology order entry with decision support: initial clinical experience.带有决策支持的放射学医嘱录入:初步临床经验
J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Oct;3(10):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.05.006.
5
Increasing the appropriateness of outpatient imaging: effects of a barrier to ordering low-yield examinations.提高门诊影像检查的适宜性:降低低价值检查项目的开单壁垒的效果。
Radiology. 2010 Jun;255(3):842-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091228.
6
A Day in the Life of MRI: The Variety and Appropriateness of Exams Being Performed in Canada.磁共振成像的一天:加拿大进行的检查的多样性和适宜性。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018 May;69(2):151-161. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
The effect of clinical decision support for advanced inpatient imaging.临床决策支持对住院患者高级影像学检查的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr;12(4):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.013. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
8
MRI order appropriateness for chronic neck pain: Comparison of ordering practices and treatment outcomes for primary care physicians and specialists.MRI 检查用于慢性颈痛的适宜性:初级保健医生和专家的医嘱实践和治疗结果比较。
J Orthop Res. 2024 Feb;42(2):425-433. doi: 10.1002/jor.25669. Epub 2023 Aug 13.
9
Randomized Clinical Trial of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Improving the Appropriateness Scores for Ordering Imaging Studies in Primary and Specialty Care Ambulatory Clinics.随机临床试验:一种临床决策支持工具,用于提高初级保健和专科门诊中影像检查申请的适宜性评分。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Nov;213(5):1015-1020. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21511. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
10
JOURNAL CLUB: Radiologists' Perceptions of Computerized Decision Support: A Focus Group Study From the Medicare Imaging Demonstration Project.期刊俱乐部:放射科医生对计算机化决策支持的看法:来自医疗保险影像示范项目的焦点小组研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Nov;205(5):947-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14801.

引用本文的文献

1
Computed tomography referral guidelines adherence in Europe: insights from a seven-country audit.欧洲计算机断层扫描转诊指南的依从性:七国审计的见解
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar;35(3):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11083-x. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Impact and effect of imaging referral guidelines on patients and radiology services: a systematic review.影像转诊指南对患者及放射科服务的影响:一项系统综述
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):532-541. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10938-7. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
3
Justification: gain or game.理由:利益或博弈。
Radiol Bras. 2024 May 7;57:e20230117. doi: 10.1590/0100-3984.2023.0117. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.