• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别对心血管疾病高危退伍军人胆固醇控制满意度和信心的影响。

Impact of Gender on Satisfaction and Confidence in Cholesterol Control Among Veterans at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

作者信息

Goldstein Karen M, Stechuchak Karen M, Zullig Leah L, Oddone Eugene Z, Olsen Maren K, McCant Felicia A, Bastian Lori A, Batch Bryan C, Bosworth Hayden B

机构信息

1 Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.

2 Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):806-814. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5739. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2016.5739
PMID:28192012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507731/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compared with men, women have poorer lipid control. Although potential causes of this disparity have been explored, it is unknown whether patient-centered factors such as satisfaction and confidence contribute. We evaluated (1) whether satisfaction with lipid control and confidence in ability to improve it vary by gender and (2) whether sociodemographic characteristics modify the association.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated baseline survey responses from the Cardiovascular Intervention Improvement Telemedicine Study, including self-rated satisfaction with cholesterol levels and confidence in controlling cholesterol. Participants had poorly controlled hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia.

RESULTS

A total of 428 veterans (15% women) participated. Compared with men, women had higher low-density lipoprotein values at 141.2 versus 121.7 mg/dL, respectively (p < 0.05), higher health literacy, and were less likely to have someone to help track their medications (all p < 0.05). In an adjusted model, women were less satisfied with their cholesterol levels than men with estimated mean scores of 4.3 versus 5.6 on a 1-10 Likert scale (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in confidence by gender. Participants with support for tracking medications reported higher confidence levels than those without, estimated mean 7.8 versus 7.2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Women veterans at high risk for cardiovascular disease were less satisfied with their lipid control than men; however, confidence in ability to improve lipid levels was similar. Veterans without someone to help to track medications were less confident, and women were less likely to have this type of social support. Lack of social support for medication tracking may be a factor in lingering gender-based disparities in hyperlipidemia.

摘要

背景

与男性相比,女性的血脂控制情况较差。尽管已经探讨了这种差异的潜在原因,但尚不清楚以患者为中心的因素,如满意度和信心是否起作用。我们评估了(1)血脂控制的满意度和改善血脂能力的信心是否因性别而异,以及(2)社会人口学特征是否会改变这种关联。

材料与方法

我们评估了心血管介入改善远程医疗研究的基线调查回复,包括对胆固醇水平的自评满意度和控制胆固醇的信心。参与者患有控制不佳的高血压和/或高胆固醇血症。

结果

共有428名退伍军人(15%为女性)参与。与男性相比,女性的低密度脂蛋白值更高,分别为141.2mg/dL和121.7mg/dL(p<0.05),健康素养更高,且不太可能有人帮助她们追踪药物治疗情况(所有p<0.05)。在一个校正模型中,女性对其胆固醇水平的满意度低于男性,在1-10李克特量表上的估计平均得分分别为4.3和5.6(p<0.05)。性别之间的信心没有显著差异。有药物追踪支持的参与者报告的信心水平高于没有支持的参与者,估计平均分为7.8和7.2(p<0.05)。

结论

心血管疾病高危的女性退伍军人对血脂控制的满意度低于男性;然而,改善血脂水平的信心相似。没有他人帮助追踪药物治疗的退伍军人信心较低,且女性获得这种社会支持的可能性较小。缺乏药物追踪的社会支持可能是高脂血症中持续存在的性别差异的一个因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of Gender on Satisfaction and Confidence in Cholesterol Control Among Veterans at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.性别对心血管疾病高危退伍军人胆固醇控制满意度和信心的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):806-814. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5739. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
2
Heart matters: Gender and racial differences cardiovascular disease risk factor control among veterans.心脏问题:退伍军人中性别和种族在心血管疾病危险因素控制方面的差异
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.05.005.
3
Accounting for clinical action reduces estimates of gender disparities in lipid management for diabetic veterans.临床行为的考量降低了糖尿病退伍军人血脂管理中性别差异的估计。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S529-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2340-5.
4
Gender disparities in lipid-lowering therapy among veterans with diabetes.糖尿病退伍军人降脂治疗中的性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Jul-Aug;21(4 Suppl):S176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.009.
5
Decomposing gender differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among veterans with or at risk for cardiovascular illness.分解有或有心血管疾病风险的退伍军人中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 Mar;22(2):e201-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
6
Gender Disparities in Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease: Insights from a Managed Care Population.心血管疾病降脂治疗中的性别差异:来自管理式医疗人群的见解
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Jul;25(7):697-706. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5282. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Sex Differences in the Prevalence of, and Trends in, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Treatment, and Control in the United States, 2001 to 2016.美国 2001 至 2016 年心血管危险因素、治疗和控制的流行率及变化趋势的性别差异。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 19;139(8):1025-1035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035550.
8
Sex disparity persists in the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women on statin therapy compared to that in men.与男性相比,在接受他汀类药物治疗的女性中,心血管疾病预防方面仍然存在性别差异。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Aug;28(8):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
9
Gender Disparity in Lipid Target Achievements in High and Very High Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Patients in the Arabian Gulf.阿拉伯湾地区动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病高风险和极高风险患者血脂目标达成情况中的性别差异
Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;15(1):51-58. doi: 10.2174/1570161114666161003095139.
10
Cardiovascular Risk and Risk Factor Management in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Cohort Study Assessing Sex Disparities.2 型糖尿病患者的心血管风险和危险因素管理:一项基于人群的队列研究,评估性别差异。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 11;139(24):2742-2753. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039100. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Can self-rated health be useful to primary care physicians as a diagnostic indicator of metabolic dysregulations amongst patients with type 2 diabetes? A population-based study.自我评估健康状况对基层医疗医生而言能否作为2型糖尿病患者代谢失调的诊断指标?一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 16;26(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02671-3.
2
An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Literature, 2016 to 2023: A Systematic Review.2016年至2023年女性退伍军人健康文献证据图谱:一项系统综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256372. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6372.
3
Pathways From Socioeconomic Factors to Major Cardiovascular Events Among Postmenopausal Veteran and Nonveteran Women: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative.绝经后退伍军人和非退伍军人女性中从社会经济因素到主要心血管事件的途径:来自女性健康倡议的发现
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):e037253. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037253. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
4
Impact of telehealth on the current and future practice of lipidology: a scoping review.远程医疗对当前和未来脂质学实践的影响:范围综述。
J Clin Lipidol. 2023 Jan-Feb;17(1):40-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2022.12.003. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
5
Joint effect of race/ethnicity or location of residence and sex on low density lipoprotein-cholesterol among veterans with type 2 diabetes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.种族/民族或居住地和性别对 2 型糖尿病退伍军人中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的联合影响:一项 10 年回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01730-8.
6
Barriers to cardiovascular disease preventive behaviors among OEF/OIF/OND women and men veterans.作战暴露后(OEF)/伊拉克自由行动(OIF)/持久自由行动(OND)退伍军人中,女性和男性心血管疾病预防行为的障碍。
Health Psychol. 2020 Apr;39(4):298-306. doi: 10.1037/hea0000844. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Gender Differences in Outcomes Following a Pain-Free, Home-Based Exercise Program for Claudication.静息痛型跛行患者行无痛家庭运动方案后结局的性别差异。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Sep;28(9):1313-1321. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7113. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Educational Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention by Race, Ethnicity, and Urban/Rural Status.基于诊所的心血管疾病预防教育干预在种族、族裔及城乡状况方面的效果。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Nov;25(11):1174-1186. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5387. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
2
Sex Differences in Demographics, Risk Factors, Presentation, and Noninvasive Testing in Stable Outpatients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.疑似冠心病稳定门诊患者在人口统计学、危险因素、临床表现及无创检查方面的性别差异:来自PROMISE试验的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):337-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.001.
3
Comparison of Adherence to Guideline-Based Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Men Versus Women.男性与女性在遵循基于指南的胆固醇治疗目标方面的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 1;117(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
4
Statin Intolerance: the Clinician's Perspective.他汀不耐受:临床医生的观点
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Dec;17(12):69. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0552-3.
5
Association between adherence, treatment satisfaction and illness perception in hypertensive patients.高血压患者的依从性、治疗满意度与疾病认知之间的关联
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 May;30(5):341-5. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.86. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Sex, Myocardial Infarction, and the Failure of Risk Scores in Women.性别、心肌梗死与女性风险评分的失效
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Nov;24(11):859-61. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5412. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Risk for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Grand Rounds Discussion From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.治疗血胆固醇以降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险:贝斯以色列女执事医疗中心的大查房讨论。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 18;163(4):280-90. doi: 10.7326/M15-1125.
8
Management of dyslipidemia for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: synopsis of the 2014 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense clinical practice guideline.降低心血管疾病风险的血脂异常管理:2014 年美国退伍军人事务部和美国国防部临床实践指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Aug 18;163(4):291-7. doi: 10.7326/M15-0840.
9
Patient-reported medication adherence barriers among patients with cardiovascular risk factors.心血管危险因素患者报告的药物依从性障碍。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Jun;21(6):479-85. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.6.479.
10
Sex differences in cardiovascular mortality in diabetics and nondiabetic subjects: a population-based study (Italy).糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者心血管死亡率的性别差异:一项基于人群的研究(意大利)
Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:914057. doi: 10.1155/2015/914057. Epub 2015 Mar 22.