Sweet Andrew D, Chesser R Terry, Johnson Kevin P
Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1816 S. Oak St., Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USA.
Int J Parasitol. 2017 May;47(6):347-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Host-parasite coevolutionary histories can differ among multiple groups of parasites associated with the same group of hosts. For example, parasitic wing and body lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) of New World pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbidae) differ in their cophylogenetic patterns, with body lice exhibiting higher phylogenetic congruence with their hosts than wing lice. In this study, we focus on the wing and body lice of Australian phabine pigeons and doves to determine whether the patterns in New World pigeons and doves are consistent with those of pigeons and doves from other regions. Using molecular sequence data for most phabine species and their lice, we estimated phylogenetic trees for all three groups (pigeons and doves, wing lice and body lice), and compared the phabine (host) tree with both parasite trees using multiple cophylogenetic methods. We found a pattern opposite to that found for New World pigeons and doves, with Australian wing lice showing congruence with their hosts, and body lice exhibiting a lack of congruence. There are no documented records of hippoboscid flies associated with Australian phabines, thus these lice may lack the opportunity to disperse among host species by attaching to hippoboscid flies (phoresis), which could explain these patterns. However, additional sampling for flies is needed to confirm this hypothesis. Large differences in body size among phabine pigeons and doves may also help to explain the congruence of the wing lice with their hosts. It may be more difficult for wing lice than body lice to switch among hosts that vary more dramatically in size. The results from this study highlight how host-parasite coevolutionary histories can vary by region, and how local factors can shape the relationship.
宿主与寄生虫的协同进化历史在与同一组宿主相关的多组寄生虫之间可能存在差异。例如,新大陆鸽子和鸠类(鸟纲:鸠鸽科)的寄生性翅虱和体虱(昆虫纲:虱目)在共系统发育模式上有所不同,体虱与其宿主的系统发育一致性高于翅虱。在本研究中,我们聚焦于澳大利亚雉鸠和鸽类的翅虱和体虱,以确定新大陆鸽子和鸠类的模式是否与其他地区的鸽子和鸠类一致。利用大多数雉鸠物种及其虱子的分子序列数据,我们估计了所有三组(鸽子和鸠类、翅虱和体虱)的系统发育树,并使用多种共系统发育方法将雉鸠(宿主)树与两种寄生虫树进行比较。我们发现了与新大陆鸽子和鸠类相反的模式,澳大利亚翅虱与其宿主表现出一致性,而体虱则缺乏一致性。目前没有关于与澳大利亚雉鸠相关的虱蝇的记录,因此这些虱子可能缺乏通过附着在虱蝇上(搭便车)在宿主物种间传播的机会,这可以解释这些模式。然而,需要对苍蝇进行更多采样以证实这一假设。雉鸠和鸽类在体型上的巨大差异也可能有助于解释翅虱与其宿主的一致性。对于翅虱来说,在体型差异更大的宿主之间转换可能比体虱更困难。这项研究的结果凸显了宿主与寄生虫的协同进化历史如何因地区而异,以及局部因素如何塑造这种关系。