Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Higashi-Hiroshima Medical Center, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jun;12(6):1015-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
Expression of immune markers is of scientific interest because of their potential roles as predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy. Although the microenvironment of metastatic tumors and/or therapy-inducible histological transformation may affect the expression of these immune markers, there are few data regarding this context.
A 76-year-old never-smoking female with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (AC) acquired resistance to gefitinib. After her death, an autopsy revealed SCLC transformation and EGFR T790M secondary mutation (T790M) as mutually exclusive resistance mechanisms occurring differently in different metastases; two liver metastases (SCLC versus AC with T790M) and two lymph node metastases (SCLC versus AC with T790M) were analyzed to compare the expression status of immune markers by immunohistochemistry and by an immune oncology gene expression panel.
Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein was partially expressed in tumor cells with AC lesions (T790M) but not in tumor cells with SCLC transformation. The liver metastasis with SCLC transformation showed no stromal PD-L1 expression and scant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, whereas the other lesions demonstrated stromal PD-L1 staining and infiltration of CD8-positive T cells. Data generated using an immuno-oncology gene expression panel indicated a higher level of T-cell costimulatory molecules and lower expression of type I interferon-regulated genes in lesions with SCLC transformation.
These data highlight the heterogeneity of expression of immune markers depending on the metastatic sites and histological transformation and indicate that the biopsy specimen from one lesion may not be representative of immune marker status for all lesions.
免疫标志物的表达具有科学意义,因为它们可能作为免疫治疗的预测生物标志物。尽管转移性肿瘤的微环境和/或治疗诱导的组织学转化可能会影响这些免疫标志物的表达,但关于这方面的数据很少。
一名 76 岁的从不吸烟女性患有 EGFR 突变型肺腺癌(AC),对吉非替尼产生耐药性。她去世后,尸检显示小细胞肺癌(SCLC)转化和 EGFR T790M 继发突变(T790M)作为相互排斥的耐药机制,在不同的转移部位表现不同;分析了两个肝转移灶(SCLC 与携带 T790M 的 AC)和两个淋巴结转移灶(SCLC 与携带 T790M 的 AC),通过免疫组化和免疫肿瘤基因表达谱比较免疫标志物的表达状态。
携带 AC 病变(T790M)的肿瘤细胞部分表达程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)蛋白,但携带 SCLC 转化的肿瘤细胞不表达。具有 SCLC 转化的肝转移灶无基质 PD-L1 表达且肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞稀少,而其他病变则显示基质 PD-L1 染色和 CD8 阳性 T 细胞浸润。使用免疫肿瘤基因表达谱获得的数据表明,具有 SCLC 转化的病变中 T 细胞共刺激分子水平较高,I 型干扰素调节基因表达水平较低。
这些数据强调了免疫标志物表达的异质性取决于转移部位和组织学转化,并表明一个病变的活检标本可能不能代表所有病变的免疫标志物状态。