Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):68-73. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0701-1. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical surgery is a promising strategy to improve survival of patients with stage III gastric cancer, but is associated with the risk of preoperative overdiagnosis by which patients with early disease may receive unnecessary intensive chemotherapy.
We assessed the validity of a preoperative diagnostic criterion in a prospective multicenter study. Patients with gastric cancer with a clinical diagnosis of T2/T3/T4, M0, except for diffuse large tumors and extensive bulky nodal disease, were eligible. Prospectively recorded clinical diagnoses (cT category, cN category) were compared with postoperative pathological diagnoses (pT category, pN category, and pathological stage). The primary endpoint was the proportion of pathological stage I tumors among those diagnosed as cT3/T4, which we expected to be 5% or less.
Data from 1260 patients enrolled from 53 institutions were analyzed. The proportion of pathological stage I tumors in those with a diagnosis of cT3/T4 (primary endpoint) was 12.3%, which was much higher than the prespecified value. The positive predictive value and the sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors were 43.6% and 87.8% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT for lymph node metastasis were 62.5% and 65.7% respectively. After exploring several diagnostic criteria, we propose, for future NAC trials in Japan, a diagnosis of "cT3/T4 with cN1/N2/N3," by which inclusion of pathological stage I tumors was reduced to 6.5%, although its sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors decreased to 64.5%.
Clinical diagnosis of T3/T4 tumors was not an optimal criterion to select patients for intensive NAC trials because more than 10% of patients with pathological stage I disease were included. We propose the criterion "cT3/T4 and cN1/N2/N3" instead.
新辅助化疗(NAC)后行根治性手术是提高 III 期胃癌患者生存率的一种有前途的策略,但与术前过度诊断的风险相关,通过这种风险,早期疾病患者可能会接受不必要的强化化疗。
我们在一项前瞻性多中心研究中评估了术前诊断标准的有效性。患有 T2/T3/T4、M0 的胃癌患者(除弥漫性大肿瘤和广泛大块淋巴结疾病外)符合条件。前瞻性记录的临床诊断(cT 分期、cN 分期)与术后病理诊断(pT 分期、pN 分期和病理分期)进行比较。主要终点是 cT3/T4 诊断中病理 I 期肿瘤的比例,我们预计该比例应在 5%或以下。
对来自 53 家机构的 1260 名患者的数据进行了分析。在诊断为 cT3/T4 的患者中(主要终点),病理 I 期肿瘤的比例为 12.3%,远高于预设值。病理 III 期肿瘤的阳性预测值和灵敏度分别为 43.6%和 87.8%。增强 CT 对淋巴结转移的灵敏度和特异性分别为 62.5%和 65.7%。在探索了几种诊断标准后,我们建议在日本未来的 NAC 试验中,采用“cT3/T4 伴 cN1/N2/N3”的诊断标准,通过该标准,纳入的病理 I 期肿瘤减少至 6.5%,尽管其病理 III 期肿瘤的灵敏度降低至 64.5%。
临床诊断 T3/T4 肿瘤不是选择接受强化 NAC 试验患者的最佳标准,因为有 10%以上的病理 I 期疾病患者被纳入。我们建议采用“cT3/T4 和 cN1/N2/N3”的标准。