Suppr超能文献

出血评分用于诊断 von Willebrand 病。

Bleeding Scores for the Diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Semin Thromb Hemost. 2017 Jul;43(5):530-539. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597289. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

Abstract

Obtaining a personal history of bleeding is a critical component to the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). The collection of this information can be challenging for physicians, however, as the reporting and interpretation of bleeding symptoms is subjective. The need for more precise quantification of bleeding symptoms was recognized and the Vicenza Bleeding Questionnaire was developed in 2005. This questionnaire collects data regarding the presence and severity of bleeding symptoms and generates a bleeding score by summing the severity of all symptoms reported by a patient. Several subsequent bleeding assessment tools (BATs) have been developed based from this original questionnaire and there has been a surge in the use of BATs in various clinical settings for the diagnosis and evaluation of VWD. This review will discuss the evolution of BATs over the past decade, as well as their use and validation in various settings for the diagnosis and evaluation of VWD. Additionally, we will discuss the clinical utility of BATs, the limitations of these tools, and future directions.

摘要

获取个人出血史是诊断血管性血友病(VWD)的关键组成部分。然而,由于出血症状的报告和解释具有主观性,医生收集这些信息可能具有挑战性。人们认识到需要更精确地量化出血症状,并于 2005 年开发了维琴察出血问卷。该问卷收集有关出血症状的存在和严重程度的数据,并通过汇总患者报告的所有症状的严重程度来生成出血评分。此后,根据原始问卷开发了几种新的出血评估工具(BATs),并且在各种临床环境中,这些工具在 VWD 的诊断和评估中的使用呈激增趋势。这篇综述将讨论过去十年中 BATs 的发展,以及它们在各种环境中用于 VWD 的诊断和评估的用途和验证。此外,我们将讨论 BATs 的临床实用性、这些工具的局限性以及未来方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验