Medical University of Warsaw Hospital, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Dermatology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jun;76(6):1161-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.035. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
Epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV) is a rare genodermatosis characterized by abnormal susceptibility to cutaneous human beta-papillomavirus infections causing persistent flat warts or pityriasis versicolor-like lesions. This generalized verrucous skin disorder resembles generalized verrucosis, but these 2 conditions are distinguished by differences in clinical manifestation and the human papillomavirus types involved. A breakthrough in our understanding of EV was the discovery that homozygous inactivating mutations in TMC6 (EVER1) and TMC8 (EVER2) determine susceptibility to this disorder; however, they have not solved all EV cases fully. These deficiencies account for 75% of affected individuals, leaving a substantial number of patients without an underlying genetic cause. Recently, it has been revealed that mutations in additional genes (RHOH, MST-1, CORO1A, and IL-7) result in extensive human beta-papillomavirus replication and therefore manifest with an EV-like phenotype. The term "acquired EV" is used to describe an EV-like phenotype that develops in immunocompromised hosts, and the introduction of this entity further aggravates the confusion. Reevaluation of these entities is warranted. Here, we review the available data on this issue, provide up to date information on the major characteristics that differentiate between these seemingly clinically similar disorders, and highlight the different mechanisms involved in each disorder.
疣状表皮发育不良(EV)是一种罕见的遗传性皮肤病,其特征是对人类β型乳头瘤病毒感染的异常易感性,导致持续的扁平疣或花斑癣样病变。这种全身性疣状皮肤疾病类似于全身性疣状症,但这两种疾病在临床表现和涉及的人乳头瘤病毒类型上有所区别。对 EV 的理解有了突破,发现 TMC6(EVER1)和 TMC8(EVER2)的纯合失活突变决定了对这种疾病的易感性;然而,它们并没有完全解决所有的 EV 病例。这些缺陷占受影响个体的 75%,留下了相当数量的患者没有潜在的遗传原因。最近,已经揭示了其他基因(RHOH、MST-1、CORO1A 和 IL-7)的突变导致广泛的人类β型乳头瘤病毒复制,因此表现出类似于 EV 的表型。“获得性 EV”一词用于描述在免疫功能低下宿主中发展的类似于 EV 的表型,引入这一实体进一步加剧了混淆。有必要对这些实体进行重新评估。在这里,我们回顾了这个问题的现有数据,提供了最新的信息,说明区分这些看似临床相似疾病的主要特征,并强调了每个疾病中涉及的不同机制。