• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增殖在决定对拓扑异构酶II活性化疗药物敏感性中的作用。

Role of proliferation in determining sensitivity to topoisomerase II-active chemotherapy agents.

作者信息

Sullivan D M, Chow K C, Glisson B S, Ross W E

出版信息

NCI Monogr. 1987(4):73-8.

PMID:2819735
Abstract

We have examined the relationship between topoisomerase II content and the DNA cleavage activity and cytotoxicity of etoposide during proliferative and quiescent culture conditions. In proliferating cultures of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, human lymphoblastic CCRF cells, and mouse leukemia L1210 cells, there was easily detectable topoisomerase II by immunoblotting. In contrast, quiescent CHO cells contained virtually no detectable topoisomerase II, while the content of L1210 cells was unchanged. Enzyme content of quiescent CCRF cells was diminished but detectable. DNA cleavage activity induced by etoposide correlated well with enzyme content in proliferating and quiescent cells. Quiescent CHO and CCRF cultures were highly resistant to the cytotoxic effects of etoposide as expected. However, despite unchanged enzyme content and DNA cleavage activity, there was also significant resistance observed in plateau L1210 cells. We have also investigated topoisomerase content and drug activity as a function of cell cycle progression. Following serum stimulation of confluent BalbC/3T3 cells, maximal etoposide-induced DNA cleavage activity is observed in G2/M and is associated with an increase in topoisomerase II content. Maximum cytotoxicity, however, occurs during mid to late S phase. Our data suggest that topoisomerase II content may be an important determinant of chemotherapeutic sensitivity during alterations in the proliferative status of the cell. However, it is clear that other factors must be involved in cell sensitivity, and elucidation of these may contribute to our understanding of the mechanism of action of these drugs.

摘要

我们研究了拓扑异构酶II含量与依托泊苷在增殖和静止培养条件下的DNA切割活性及细胞毒性之间的关系。在中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞、人淋巴细胞CCRF细胞和小鼠白血病L1210细胞的增殖培养物中,通过免疫印迹法很容易检测到拓扑异构酶II。相比之下,静止的CHO细胞几乎检测不到拓扑异构酶II,而L1210细胞的含量未变。静止CCRF细胞的酶含量减少但仍可检测到。依托泊苷诱导的DNA切割活性与增殖和静止细胞中的酶含量密切相关。如预期的那样,静止的CHO和CCRF培养物对依托泊苷的细胞毒性具有高度抗性。然而,尽管酶含量和DNA切割活性未变,但在平台期L1210细胞中也观察到了显著的抗性。我们还研究了拓扑异构酶含量和药物活性作为细胞周期进程的函数。在汇合的BalbC/3T3细胞受到血清刺激后,在G2/M期观察到最大的依托泊苷诱导的DNA切割活性,并且与拓扑异构酶II含量的增加相关。然而,最大细胞毒性发生在S期中期至后期。我们的数据表明,拓扑异构酶II含量可能是细胞增殖状态改变期间化疗敏感性的重要决定因素。然而,很明显其他因素也必须参与细胞敏感性,阐明这些因素可能有助于我们理解这些药物的作用机制。

相似文献

1
Role of proliferation in determining sensitivity to topoisomerase II-active chemotherapy agents.增殖在决定对拓扑异构酶II活性化疗药物敏感性中的作用。
NCI Monogr. 1987(4):73-8.
2
Proliferation-dependent topoisomerase II content as a determinant of antineoplastic drug action in human, mouse, and Chinese hamster ovary cells.增殖依赖性拓扑异构酶II含量作为人、小鼠和中国仓鼠卵巢细胞中抗肿瘤药物作用的决定因素。
Cancer Res. 1987 Aug 1;47(15):3973-9.
3
Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA breaks and cytotoxicity in relation to cell proliferation and the cell cycle in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts and L1210 leukemia cells.拓扑异构酶II介导的DNA断裂及细胞毒性与NIH 3T3成纤维细胞和L1210白血病细胞的细胞增殖及细胞周期的关系
Cancer Res. 1987 Apr 15;47(8):2050-5.
4
Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to the topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor ICRF-159: a Tyr49Phe mutation confers high-level resistance to bisdioxopiperazines.对拓扑异构酶II催化抑制剂ICRF-159具有抗性的中国仓鼠卵巢细胞:Tyr49Phe突变赋予对双二氧哌嗪的高水平抗性。
Cancer Res. 1998 Apr 1;58(7):1460-8.
5
Development and properties of an etoposide-resistant human leukaemic CCRF-CEM cell line.依托泊苷耐药人白血病CCRF-CEM细胞系的建立及其特性
Anticancer Drug Des. 1990 Feb;5(1):149-57.
6
A cisplatin-resistant murine leukemia cell line exhibits increased topoisomerase II activity.一种耐顺铂的小鼠白血病细胞系表现出拓扑异构酶II活性增加。
Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;46(3):431-6.
7
Drastic reduction of topoisomerase II alpha associated with major acquired resistance to topoisomerase II active agents but minor perturbations of cell growth.拓扑异构酶IIα的显著减少与对拓扑异构酶II活性剂的主要获得性耐药相关,但对细胞生长的干扰较小。
Oncol Res. 1995;7(7-8):407-16.
8
Relationship of DNA topoisomerase II alpha and beta expression to cytotoxicity of antineoplastic agents in human acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines.DNA拓扑异构酶IIα和β的表达与人类急性淋巴细胞白血病细胞系中抗肿瘤药物细胞毒性的关系
Cancer Res. 1995 Jan 1;55(1):78-82.
9
Differential cytotoxic pathways of topoisomerase I and II anticancer agents after overexpression of the E2F-1/DP-1 transcription factor complex.E2F-1/DP-1转录因子复合物过表达后拓扑异构酶I和II抗癌药物的差异细胞毒性途径
Clin Cancer Res. 2000 Apr;6(4):1488-97.
10
Resistance of human leukemic and normal lymphocytes to drug-induced DNA cleavage and low levels of DNA topoisomerase II.人类白血病淋巴细胞和正常淋巴细胞对药物诱导的DNA裂解的抗性以及低水平的DNA拓扑异构酶II
Cancer Res. 1988 Jun 15;48(12):3537-43.

引用本文的文献

1
JAZF1: A Metabolic Regulator of Sensitivity to a Polyamine-Targeted Therapy.JAZF1:多胺靶向治疗敏感性的代谢调节剂。
Mol Cancer Res. 2023 Jan 3;21(1):24-35. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-22-0316.
2
Bystander or no bystander for gene directed enzyme prodrug therapy.旁观者还是旁观者:基因导向酶前药治疗。
Molecules. 2009 Nov 10;14(11):4517-45. doi: 10.3390/molecules14114517.
3
Influence of topoisomerase II on the formation of oxygen-dependent radiation-induced DNA damage.拓扑异构酶II对氧依赖性辐射诱导的DNA损伤形成的影响。
Br J Cancer Suppl. 1996 Jul;27:S196-9.
4
Teniposide: overview of its therapeutic potential in adult cancers.替尼泊苷:其在成人癌症治疗潜力的概述
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34 Suppl:S127-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00684876.
5
Proliferation-associated nuclear antigen Ki-S1 is identical with topoisomerase II alpha. Delineation of a carboxy-terminal epitope with peptide antibodies.增殖相关核抗原Ki-S1与拓扑异构酶IIα相同。用肽抗体描绘羧基末端表位。
Am J Pathol. 1995 Jun;146(6):1302-8.
6
Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.依托泊苷。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在癌症联合化疗中的治疗潜力的综述。
Drugs. 1990 Mar;39(3):438-90. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199039030-00008.