Suppr超能文献

使用不同器械技术后的术后疼痛强度:一项随机临床研究。

Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study.

作者信息

Çiçek Ersan, Koçak Mustafa Murat, Koçak Sibel, Sağlam Baran Can, Türker Sevinç Aktemur

机构信息

Bülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics, Zonguldak, Turkey.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Jan-Feb;25(1):20-26. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0138.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the influence of the instrumentation techniques on the incidence and intensity of postoperative pain in single-visit root canal treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety patients with single root/canal and non-vital pulps were included. The patients were assigned into 3 groups according to root canal instrumentation technique used; modified step-back, reciprocal, and rotational techniques. Root canal treatment was carried out in a single visit and the severity of postoperative pain was assessed via 4-point pain intensity scale. All the participants were called through the phone at 12, 24 and 48 h to obtain the pain scores. Data were analyzed through the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

There was significant difference between all groups (p<0.05). The modified step-back technique produced postoperative pain significantly lower than the rotational (p=0.018) and reciprocal (p=0.020) techniques. No difference was found between the reciprocal and rotational techniques (p=0.868). Postoperative pain in the first 12 h period (p=0.763) and in the 24 h period (p=0.147) was not significantly different between the groups. However, the difference in the 48 h period was statistically different between the groups (p=0.040).

CONCLUSION

All instrumentation techniques caused postoperative pain. The modified step-back technique produced less pain compared to the rotational and reciprocal techniques.

摘要

目的

本临床研究旨在评估根管预备技术对一次性根管治疗术后疼痛发生率及疼痛强度的影响。

材料与方法

纳入90例单根/单根管且牙髓无活力的患者。根据所使用的根管预备技术将患者分为3组;改良逐步后退法、逐步深入法和旋转法。所有患者均接受一次性根管治疗,并通过4级疼痛强度量表评估术后疼痛的严重程度。在术后12、24和48小时通过电话联系所有参与者以获取疼痛评分。数据通过Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析。

结果

所有组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。改良逐步后退法产生的术后疼痛明显低于旋转法(p=0.018)和逐步深入法(p=0.020)。逐步深入法和旋转法之间未发现差异(p=0.868)。各组之间在术后最初12小时(p=0.763)和24小时(p=0.147)的疼痛无显著差异。然而,在48小时时,各组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p=0.040)。

结论

所有根管预备技术均会引起术后疼痛。与旋转法和逐步深入法相比,改良逐步后退法产生的疼痛较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a48/5289396/e42a36eafb65/1678-7757-jaos-25-1-0020-gf01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验